Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable, well-structured instruction skill that assumes Claude's intelligence and gives concrete output and sourcing guidance. The only soft spot is the absence of explicit validation checkpoints in the research workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and never over-explains concepts Claude already knows; every line (sections, tool calls, source ordering) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Though instruction-only, the guidance is highly concrete and executable: four named output sections with sources, an explicit `task(google_search, ...)` invocation, "within the last 30 days", and "3-5 questions". | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a clear sequence (KB first → external fallback → four output sections) with guardrails ("never to fabricate…", "omit any with no signal"), but no explicit validation checkpoints for the multi-step gather-and-synthesize process. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, the well-organized sections (When to use, Output structure, Source ordering) satisfy the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |