Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, evidence-driven audit methodology: lean and actionable, with a clearly sequenced workflow, explicit validation checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure into a real rubric reference and a real helper script.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean imperative style that assumes Claude's competence; it never explains what plagiarism, git, or a screenshot is, and its long enumerations function as purposeful inspection checklists rather than padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, fully-argued executable command for the inventory helper (python <skill-dir>/scripts/build_evidence_inventory.py with --site/--reference/--output flags) plus specific git commands (git log -S, git log --all --name-status) and a numbered triangulation/fix procedure. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced six-phase process with explicit validation checkpoints ('Stop and report an access gap when a promised reference is missing', 'Treat its output as leads for human review, not an automatic verdict') and a terminal 'Completion checks' checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview that signals one-level-deep references clearly ('Read references/audit-rubric.md before judging findings'); both referenced files (references/audit-rubric.md and scripts/build_evidence_inventory.py) exist and are appropriately split out from the overview. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |