CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

audit-reference-originality

Audit a website or digital experience against its supplied source references for originality and plagiarism risk. Use when Codex must compare current or historical site output with reference pages, capture packs, screenshots, copy, brands, numbers, images, assets, videos, layouts, motion, or code; raise evidence-backed red flags; distinguish common visual grammar from distinctive copying; and propose concrete fixes without making unsupported legal claims.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, multi-step audit workflow with executable tooling, explicit access-gap validation, a one-level-deep reference split, and a completion checklist. It is concise, actionable, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean, bullet-driven prose that assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what plagiarism or a capture pack is, and every section (registry, inventory, comparison, triangulation, fixes, reporting) earns its tokens, matching the level-3 'every token earns its place' anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready executable guidance — the full `python <skill-dir>/scripts/build_evidence_inventory.py --site ... --reference ... --output ...` invocation plus concrete git commands (`git log -S`, `git log --all --name-status`) and enumerated category checks — rather than vague direction.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced six-step process with explicit validation checkpoints for a batch/evidence operation — 'Stop and report an access gap when a promised reference is missing', 'Do not clear a site after checking only its homepage screenshot', 'Never turn missing evidence into a pass' — plus a terminal 'Completion checks' checklist, satisfying the level-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is an overview that clearly signals a single one-level-deep reference ('Read [references/audit-rubric.md] before judging findings') and one helper script, both verified to exist; the detailed severity/evidence rubric is correctly split into the reference file rather than inlined, matching the level-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that states concrete audit actions, an explicit 'Use when' trigger with broad natural keywords, and a well-delineated niche. It also appropriately scopes legal claims ('without making unsupported legal claims').

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Audit a website', 'compare current or historical site output', 'raise evidence-backed red flags', 'distinguish common visual grammar from distinctive copying', and 'propose concrete fixes' — matching the level-3 anchor rather than the single-action level-2 example.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Audit ... for originality and plagiarism risk') and when ('Use when Codex must compare ...'), with an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause, so it is not capped at 2 for a missing trigger.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms a user would say — 'reference pages, capture packs, screenshots, copy, brands, numbers, images, assets, videos, layouts, motion, or code' plus 'plagiarism risk' and 'originality' — giving broad coverage of common variations rather than the sparse level-2 'Works with PDF files'.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche — auditing a site against its supplied reference corpus for copying — is distinct from generic review skills, with specific triggers like 'capture packs', 'reference pages', and 'originality matrices' making wrong-skill activation unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
MengTo/Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.