blue-cloudy-clean-modern

Create a clean modern design system with a luminous blue sky atmosphere, soft drifting cloud light, minimal white framing, and serene premium typography.

Quality

52%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./agent-skills/web-design/blue-cloudy-clean-modern/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized, reasonably lean style specification with useful "Avoid" and "Tuning knobs" sections, but it has a completely empty Workflow section and lacks concrete design tokens (colors, gradients, fonts, sizing), leaving the direction actionable only at an abstract level. Consolidating the repetitive framing guidance and supplying at least one concrete palette/gradient starting point would raise quality substantially.

Suggestions

Fill or remove the empty "## Workflow" section — as written it signals a missing process; either give a short ordered build sequence (background → framing → typography → CTA → motion) or delete the header.

Add concrete tokens so the style is reproducible: at least a starter hex palette (rich cobalt → pale/washed blue), a font-stack suggestion, and one gradient or canvas snippet for the atmospheric background.

Merge the overlapping framing/pattern guidance (rails, corner squares, italic accent word, pill styles) that currently repeats across Visual target, Implementation guidance, and Recommended patterns into a single section to improve conciseness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body avoids filler and assumes competence, but key guidance is restated across sections: "thin container rails, subtle corner squares" appears in Visual target, Implementation guidance, and Recommended patterns, and the italic/serif accent word and translucent-vs-dark pill guidance each appear twice. It is mostly efficient but could be tightened by consolidating the overlapping sections, matching anchor 3 rather than the minor-trim case of 4.	3 / 5
Actionability	Directional guidance is present ("centered max-width shell", "canvas, WebGL, or a smooth layered gradient", "large clean sans-serif headlines"), but no concrete tokens are given: no hex palette, gradient stops, font stacks, spacing values, or a minimal code/gradient snippet. For a style-spec skill this is anchor 3's "missing key details" rather than anchor 4's minor gaps.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The "## Workflow" section header exists but is completely empty, and the rest of the body is an unsequenced style specification with no ordered build steps or checkpoints. The section ordering (Scope → Visual target → Implementation → Avoid) only loosely implies a rough sequence with many gaps, matching anchor 2; it is not anchor 1 because structure and coherent guidance do exist.	2 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	There are no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and the body is ~47 lines, under the 50-line simple-skill threshold, with well-organized headed sections. Per the rubric's simple-skill exception, well-organized sections alone earn a 5 with no external references needed.	5 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description communicates a distinctive visual identity but functions more as a style brief than a skill description. It has only one concrete action, no explicit "Use when" trigger clause, and limited natural-language keyword coverage for how users would actually request this style.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g., "Use when creating or restyling a landing page, hero section, or marketing site that should feel airy, calm, and premium with a blue sky aesthetic."

Enumerate the concrete deliverables beyond 'create' (e.g., "defines background treatment, framing, typography, CTA, and motion direction") to strengthen specificity.

Include natural synonyms users might say ("airy", "cloudy blue", "clean modern UI", "sky-blue theme") so the skill triggers on real phrasing.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names one concrete action ("Create a clean modern design system") while the remainder is aesthetic adjectives ("luminous blue sky atmosphere", "serene premium typography") that describe the domain's style rather than additional concrete actions. It exceeds anchor 2's generic domain-naming but lacks the multiple specific actions of anchor 4.	3 / 5
Completeness	The "what" is reasonably clear (create a design system with this aesthetic), but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guidelines. It is not anchor 2 because the "what" is more than vague.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Relevant terms like "design system", "clean modern", "blue sky", and "cloud" are present, but common natural variations users would actually say (e.g., "landing page", "UI theme", "airy", "pastel blue", "sky theme") are missing. This matches the "some relevant keywords but missing common variations" anchor rather than the good coverage of 4.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The specific aesthetic (luminous blue sky, cloud light, white framing) carves out a clear niche that is unlikely to trigger for conflicting style skills (dark-mode, monochrome minimal). Anchor 4's "mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills" fits; sibling design-direction skills could still overlap slightly.	4 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: MengTo/Skills
Path: agent-skills/web-design/blue-cloudy-clean-modern/SKILL.md
Commit: 798db0a

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.