blue-laser-clean-glass-layout

Create a clean dark glass layout system with a thin blue laser atmosphere, frosted premium shells, and polished dashboard structure.

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./agent-skills/web-design/blue-laser-clean-glass-layout/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, lean design-direction skill with actionable concrete guidance and good organization. Its main weakness is the empty Workflow section, which leaves the build sequence implicit rather than explicitly enumerated.

Suggestions

Populate the empty Workflow section with an explicit ordered build sequence (background laser/fog layer -> foreground UI layer -> nav pill -> central shell -> cards -> dashboard modules) to lift workflow clarity.

Add a few concrete numeric tuning defaults (e.g., blur radius range, shell opacity, beam thickness in px) to move actionability from mostly-executable to fully specified.

Trim ornamental phrasing such as "reads cinematic but precise" and "feel clean and expensive rather than noisy sci-fi" to tighten conciseness toward a 5.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is sectioned into tight bullets and assumes Claude's competence without explaining glassmorphism or laser basics, fitting the score-4 anchor of efficient content with minor trimmable instances; a few ornamental phrases ("reads cinematic but precise") keep it from a clean 5.	4 / 5
Actionability	As an instruction-only design skill it provides concrete directives (fixed background layer separate from scrollable foreground, separate beam thickness from glow width, one-pixel gradient borders, backdrop blur), matching mostly-executable guidance with minor gaps; it is not 5 because no precise numeric specs (blur radius, opacity) are given.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The Workflow section is empty and steps are only implicit in Implementation guidance, so the sequence is present but not explicitly enumerated and lacks checkpoints, matching the score-3 anchor; it is not 4 because no explicit step list is provided.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body is roughly 50 lines with no external references needed and is organized into clear, well-labeled sections (Use When, Scope, Visual target, Implementation guidance, Recommended patterns, Tuning knobs, Avoid), meeting the under-50-line well-organized exception for a 5.	5 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and visually distinctive, clearly conveying what the skill produces, but it omits an explicit "Use when" trigger clause which limits its completeness. Adding natural user-facing trigger phrasing would raise both completeness and trigger-term quality.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause such as "Use when the interface should feel premium, dark, and blue-led with a glassy dashboard look" to satisfy the completeness "when" requirement.

Add common user synonyms (e.g., "glassmorphism", "dark dashboard UI", "admin panel") to improve trigger-term coverage and reduce overlap ambiguity.

Replace the single verb "Create" with a short sequence of concrete actions (e.g., "Build, layer, and style a dark glass layout system...") to push specificity toward 5.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain and several concrete deliverables ("thin blue laser atmosphere", "frosted premium shells", "polished dashboard structure"), matching the score-4 anchor of several specific actions with minor coverage gaps; it falls short of 5 because it relies on a single verb ("Create") rather than multiple distinct actions.	4 / 5
Completeness	It clearly answers "what" (create a dark glass layout system with listed components) but provides no explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, so per the guideline a missing trigger caps completeness at 3 rather than 4.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural aesthetic keywords ("dark glass", "blue laser", "dashboard") are present and a user would plausibly say them, fitting above the midpoint; it is not 5 because synonyms and common variations (e.g., glassmorphism, admin panel) are missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The blue-laser-plus-dark-glass-dashboard niche is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against other glassmorphism design skills; it is not 5 because no explicit trigger phrases guarantee distinct firing.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: MengTo/Skills
Path: agent-skills/web-design/blue-laser-clean-glass-layout/SKILL.md
Commit: 4c716b5

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.