Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean skill: terse pitfalls, a fully executable recipe, and no padding. Its two real weaknesses are the unfulfilled React/Next.js integration promise from the description and a body length just past the threshold where a fully inline single-file layout is automatic.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every token earns its place: pitfalls are terse one-liners ('Clamp DPR to 1–2'), the API section is a bare option enumeration, and the recipe carries no explanatory padding or concepts Claude already knows. This matches the 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence' anchor exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The recipe is complete, copy-paste-ready code covering the primary case (responsive canvas with DPR clamp, markers, resize via destroy/recreate), plus concrete lifecycle calls. It falls short of 5 because the description promises 'integration with React/Next.js' yet the body contains no React-specific guidance at all. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action (embed a globe) is unambiguous and the recipe demonstrates the full loop including resize rebuild and destroy, so it is above the 'steps listed but checkpoints missing' anchor. Minor gaps keep it at 4: no cleanup guidance for component unmount (relevant given the React promise) and the 'What to ask the user' section is not sequenced into the workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file skill with clear, well-labeled sections (When to use / Key APIs / Pitfalls / Recipe / Questions) and no nested references. It scores 4 rather than 5 because at ~79 lines it exceeds the 'under 50 lines, no external references needed' simple-skill threshold, and the option catalog could plausibly live in a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |