CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

corner-lasers

Create a corner-anchored laser composition with thin beams, a bright emitter node, bloom, and atmospheric glow or fog.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./agent-skills/web-design/corner-lasers/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized, concise instruction set for a niche visual effect, with concrete technique names and tuning knobs. Its main weaknesses are an empty Workflow section and the lack of executable code or numeric parameters for an otherwise actionable design brief.

Suggestions

Fill the empty '## Workflow' section with a short ordered sequence (e.g. anchor point -> beam SDFs -> corner bloom -> atmospheric glow -> tuning) so the process is explicit.

Add a minimal executable shader or pseudocode snippet for the corner beam/bloom SDF, or at least concrete numeric ranges (beam thickness in pixels, bloom radius, fog falloff) to lift actionability.

Remove the redundant '## Use When' line that duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean bullet guidance organized into clear sections without explaining concepts Claude already knows; nearly every line earns its place, despite the empty '## Workflow' header and 'Use When' duplicating the description.

3 / 3

Actionability

Names concrete techniques ('signed-distance or line-distance logic', 'concentrated bloom or energy flare at the corner emitter') and tuning knobs, but provides no executable code, shader snippet, or numeric parameter values, leaving key details missing.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Though it is a simple single-task skill, the '## Workflow' section is empty, so no step sequence is actually presented; guidance sections imply an order but no explicit workflow is given.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references and is organized into well-signaled sections (Scope, Visual target, Implementation guidance, Tuning knobs, Avoid), meeting the simple-skill criterion for full marks.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinctive about a niche visual effect, but lacks an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause, leaving the activation condition implied rather than stated. Trigger terms are relevant but lean technical rather than natural.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause naming natural user triggers, e.g. 'Use when creating corner-anchored laser effects, beams-from-corner visuals, or emitter-glow scenes.'

Soften technical jargon ('emitter node', 'corner-anchored') with terms a user would actually say ('laser beams from a corner', 'corner glow effect').

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete visual elements ('thin beams', 'a bright emitter node, bloom, and atmospheric glow or fog') rather than vague language, matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does ('Create a corner-anchored laser composition...') but has no 'Use when...' or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 2 per the judging guidelines.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Contains relevant keywords (laser, beams, glow, fog) but relies on technical phrasing like 'corner-anchored laser composition' and 'emitter node', missing common natural variations a user would say.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'corner-anchored laser composition' describes a narrow, distinctive niche unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills, matching the clear-niche anchor.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
MengTo/Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.