Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a well-sequenced, validated workflow, but it is verbose and largely monolithic with only a single offloaded reference. Tightening redundancy and splitting more detail into references would improve it.
Suggestions
De-duplicate guidance that appears in both Step 3 and 'Good Fix Patterns' (RAF loop control, isDisposed guards, frame-delta caps) by keeping the how-to in the workflow and the rationale/pattern in one place.
Move the long leak-hardening checklist into a references file (e.g. references/leak-hardening.md) and link to it from the workflow to reduce inline bulk and improve progressive disclosure.
Trim exhaustive technology enumeration in Step 1's search lists to the highest-signal items, since the description already covers the full technology scope.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is actionable rather than padded, but heavy technology enumeration and redundancy between Step 3 and the 'Good Fix Patterns' section (RAF loop control, isDisposed guards, frame-delta caps all appear twice) could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable CSS, bash, and git-index-isolation code, specific selectors, concrete thresholds (IntersectionObserver ~0.01), and a measurable target (offscreenRunningCount: 0). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with an explicit verification checkpoint (rerun profiles, compare before/after route cycles, confirm offscreen loops inactive) forming a validate-fix-rerun feedback loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | One clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/browser-profiling.md) exists, but the bulk of detail (leak-hardening checklist, fix patterns) is inline in SKILL.md rather than split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |