CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

orange-clean-paper-saas

Create a clean paper-toned SaaS design system with warm neutrals, orange accent signals, rounded premium forms, and polished product illustration surfaces.

52

Quality

57%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./agent-skills/web-design/orange-clean-paper-saas/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and directionally actionable for a design-system styling skill, but it lacks concrete design tokens, leaves the Workflow section empty, and has minor atmospheric prose that could be tightened.

Suggestions

Provide concrete design tokens (e.g. specific warm paper hex values, orange accent hex, radius values, font stack) so guidance is executable rather than purely directional.

Remove the empty '## Workflow' header or populate it with a short sequenced process (define palette -> build shell -> style forms -> add illustration zone -> tune).

Trim atmospheric lines like 'Let the mood feel calm and premium' in favor of concrete directives to improve token efficiency.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean directive bullets like 'Use orange as the primary signal and action color for steps, buttons, active states...' with minimal concept padding, though a few atmospheric lines ('Let the mood feel calm and premium') and an empty '## Workflow' header could be trimmed, fitting anchor 4 rather than the fully lean 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance names concrete UI elements and treatments (paper-toned fill, delicate borders, subtle focus rings, step markers, primary CTAs) but provides no concrete tokens such as hex colors, radius values, or font choices, leaving key details missing per anchor 3 rather than the mostly-executable 4.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sections are organized (Scope, Visual target, Implementation guidance, Recommended patterns, Tuning knobs, Avoid) but the '## Workflow' section is empty and there is no sequenced process or checkpoints, so it sits at anchor 3 rather than 4.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and is broken into well-organized sections, which would warrant 5, but the empty '## Workflow' header is a minor organization gap that pulls it to anchor 4.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear, distinctive design niche but lacks a 'when to use' trigger clause, which caps completeness, and offers only one action verb with descriptive modifiers rather than multiple concrete actions.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause stating when Claude should apply this skill, e.g. when the user asks for a warm, paper-toned SaaS UI or onboarding/product design direction.

Lead with multiple concrete actions (e.g. 'Build page shells, forms, cards, CTAs, and illustration zones in a warm paper-toned SaaS style') to raise specificity.

Include natural trigger synonyms users would say ('SaaS UI', 'onboarding design', 'warm paper dashboard') to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Quotes 'Create a clean paper-toned SaaS design system with warm neutrals, orange accent signals, rounded premium forms, and polished product illustration surfaces' name the domain and concrete attributes, but only one action verb ('Create') with descriptive modifiers rather than multiple distinct actions, so it sits at anchor 3 and not 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (create a paper-toned SaaS design system) but the 'when' is entirely missing with no explicit trigger guidance, so per the missing-'Use when' cap it scores 3 and not 4.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like 'SaaS design system', 'warm neutrals', and 'orange accent signals' are relevant but lack common synonyms or natural user phrasings, and there is no 'Use when...' trigger clause, matching anchor 3 rather than the fuller coverage of 4.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'paper-toned SaaS design system with warm neutrals, orange accent signals' carves a clear niche that is mostly distinct from generic design skills with only minor overlap risk, fitting anchor 4 rather than the minimal-conflict 5.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
MengTo/Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.