CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

orange-clean-paper-saas

Create a clean paper-toned SaaS design system with warm neutrals, orange accent signals, rounded premium forms, and polished product illustration surfaces.

49

Quality

53%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./agent-skills/web-design/orange-clean-paper-saas/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and appropriately scoped as a self-contained design-direction skill, with strong section organization. Its main weaknesses are an empty Workflow header, qualitative rather than concrete design values, and minor redundancy between the Visual target and Implementation guidance sections.

Suggestions

Fill in or remove the empty '## Workflow' section so the intended apply-and-tune process is actually sequenced.

Add concrete values for the qualitative treatments (e.g., suggested radius ranges, shadow blur/opacity, sample warm-paper and orange hex values) to make guidance copy-paste ready.

De-duplicate the 'Use When' section (which repeats the description) and tighten overlap between Visual target and Implementation guidance to reclaim tokens.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is focused and free of tutorial fluff, but the 'Use When' section restates the description verbatim and the Visual target, Implementation guidance, and Recommended patterns sections overlap in content, so it could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Guidance is specific about which components get orange ('step markers, primary CTAs, highlight icons, link text, micro-badges') and which surfaces to use, but treatments stay qualitative ('generous radius', 'soft shadows', 'subtle gradient-border') without concrete values, leaving it short of copy-paste-ready.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The '## Workflow' header is present but empty, leaving the intended process unsequenced; while the single apply-this-direction action is mostly unambiguous, the placeholder section signals an incomplete workflow.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

At under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Scope, Visual target, Implementation guidance, Recommended patterns, Tuning knobs, Avoid), satisfying the simple-skill bar for progressive disclosure.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear, specific aesthetic direction but uses only one action verb and omits any explicit 'Use when' trigger guidance, capping both completeness and trigger quality at 2. It is distinct as a niche but lacks the trigger phrasing that would fully separate it from sibling design skills.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural user triggers (e.g., 'Use when building a SaaS onboarding or product UI with warm paper tones and an orange accent').

Lead with concrete actions a user would request ('Build', 'Style', 'Theme') rather than a single 'Create' verb modified by adjectives.

Include common keyword variations users might actually say ('warm dashboard', 'paper UI', 'orange-accent SaaS') to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain and concrete visual attributes ('warm neutrals, orange accent signals, rounded premium forms, polished product illustration surfaces') but relies on a single action verb ('Create'), so it does not list multiple distinct concrete actions required for a 3.

2 / 3

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill produces (a paper-toned SaaS design system) but provides no 'when should Claude use it' clause; per the guidelines a missing explicit trigger caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like 'SaaS design system', 'warm neutrals', and 'orange accent' are plausible natural phrasing for a design request, but coverage is narrow and specialized design jargon with no common variations or explicit 'Use when' triggers.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The paper-plus-orange-plus-SaaS combination is a recognizable aesthetic niche, but as a broad 'design system' skill with no explicit triggers it could still overlap with other visual-design skills.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
MengTo/Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.