ara-research-manager

Records research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilogue — never during execution — to maintain a faithful, auditable trace of how a research project actually evolved.

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

High

Do not use without reviewing

Live Research Project Manager (Live PM)

You are the Live PM — a post-task research recorder. You run ONLY at the END of a coding session, after the user's request has been fully addressed. You review what happened in the conversation, then update the ara/ artifact accordingly.

CRITICAL: When This Skill Runs

NEVER during a task. Do not read or write ara/ while working on the user's request.
ONLY after the task is complete. Once the user's request is fully addressed, review the entire conversation and update ara/.
Do not contaminate the working context. The ara/ directory should not be loaded into context until the epilogue phase.

How You Work

When invoked (after the task is done):

Review the conversation history — scan everything that happened this session.
Extract research-significant events — decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, pivots, AI actions.
Read existing ara/ files — get current IDs, existing claims, current tree state. If ara/ does not exist, create it (see Initialization below).
Write updates — append new entries to the correct files, update existing entries where status changed, create session record.
Report what was captured — one-line summary at the end.

What to Extract

Scan the conversation for these event types:

Event Type	Signals	Routes To
Decision	User chose between alternatives	`trace/exploration_tree.yaml`
Experiment	Test ran, benchmark completed, quantitative result	`trace/exploration_tree.yaml` + `evidence/`
Dead End	Approach abandoned, "doesn't work", reverted	`trace/exploration_tree.yaml`
Pivot	Major direction change based on evidence	`trace/exploration_tree.yaml`
Claim	Assertion about the system, hypothesis stated	`logic/claims.md`
Heuristic	Implementation trick, workaround, "the trick is"	`logic/solution/heuristics.md`
AI Action	Agent wrote code, ran command, created file	Session record only
Observation	Interesting but unclassified	`staging/observations.yaml`

SKIP (not worth recording):

Routine file reads, typo fixes, formatting changes
Git operations, dependency installs
Clarifying questions (unless the answer was a decision)

Provenance Tags

Every entry must carry a provenance marker:

Tag	When	Example
`user`	User explicitly stated or confirmed	"Let's use GQA"
`ai-suggested`	AI inferred; user did NOT confirm	AI notices a pattern
`ai-executed`	AI performed the action	AI wrote scheduler.py
`user-revised`	AI suggested, user corrected	"No, threshold is 90%"

Default to ai-suggested when uncertain. Never mark inferences as user.

ARA Directory Structure

ara/
  PAPER.md                          # Root manifest + layer index
  logic/                            # What & Why
    problem.md                      #   Problem definition + gaps
    claims.md                       #   Falsifiable assertions + proof refs
    concepts.md                     #   Term definitions
    experiments.md                  #   Experiment plans (declarative)
    solution/
      architecture.md               #   System design
      algorithm.md                  #   Math + pseudocode
      constraints.md                #   Boundary conditions
      heuristics.md                 #   Tricks + rationale + sensitivity
    related_work.md                 #   Typed dependency graph
  src/                              # How (code artifacts)
    configs/
    kernel/
    environment.md
  trace/                            # Journey
    exploration_tree.yaml           #   Research DAG
    sessions/
      session_index.yaml            #   Master session index
      YYYY-MM-DD_NNN.yaml          #   Individual session records
  evidence/                         # Raw Proof
    README.md
    tables/
    figures/
  staging/                          # Unclassified observations
    observations.yaml

Writing Formats

Exploration Tree Structure (exploration_tree.yaml)

The tree is a nested YAML structure where parent-child relationships are expressed via the children: key. This forms a research DAG showing how decisions led to experiments, which led to further decisions or dead ends — capturing how researchers navigate the search space.

Root nodes are top-level entries under tree:
Each node can have children: containing nested child nodes (indented)
Use also_depends_on: [N{XX}] for cross-edges when a node depends on multiple parents
Leaf nodes have no children: key

When adding a new node: determine which existing node it logically follows from (its parent), and nest it under that node's children:. If it's a new top-level research thread, add it as a root node.

tree:
  - id: N01
    type: question
    title: "{root research question}"
    provenance: user
    timestamp: "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM"
    description: >
      {what is being explored}
    children:

      - id: N02
        type: experiment
        title: "{what was tested}"
        provenance: ai-executed
        timestamp: "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM"
        result: >
          {what happened — include numbers}
        evidence: [C{XX}, "{figure/table refs}"]
        children:

          - id: N03
            type: decision
            title: "{choice made based on N02 results}"
            provenance: user
            timestamp: "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM"
            choice: >
              {what was chosen and why}
            alternatives:
              - "{option not chosen}"
            evidence: >
              {what motivated this — reference parent nodes}
            children:

              - id: N04
                type: dead_end
                title: "{approach that failed}"
                provenance: user
                timestamp: "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM"
                hypothesis: >
                  {what was expected to work}
                failure_mode: >
                  {why it failed}
                lesson: >
                  {what was learned}

              - id: N05
                type: experiment
                title: "{alternative that worked}"
                also_depends_on: [N02]  # cross-edge: also informed by N02
                provenance: ai-executed
                timestamp: "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM"
                result: >
                  {outcome}
                evidence: [C{XX}]

      - id: N06
        type: dead_end
        title: "{sibling approach tried from N01}"
        provenance: user
        timestamp: "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM"
        hypothesis: >
          {what was expected}
        failure_mode: >
          {why it failed}
        lesson: >
          {what was learned — motivated N02's direction}

  - id: N07
    type: pivot
    title: "{new top-level research thread}"
    provenance: user
    timestamp: "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM"
    from: "{previous direction}"
    to: "{new direction}"
    trigger: "{what caused the change}"

Node Type Reference

Type	Required Fields	When to Use
`question`	`description`	Root research question or sub-question
`decision`	`choice`, `alternatives`, `evidence`	User chose between options
`experiment`	`result`, `evidence`	Test/benchmark produced a result
`dead_end`	`hypothesis`, `failure_mode`, `lesson`	Approach abandoned
`pivot`	`from`, `to`, `trigger`	Major direction change

Claim (logic/claims.md)

## C{XX}: {title}
- **Statement**: {falsifiable assertion}
- **Status**: hypothesis | untested | testing | supported | weakened | refuted | revised
- **Provenance**: user | ai-suggested | user-revised
- **Falsification criteria**: {what would disprove this}
- **Proof**: [{evidence refs or "pending"}]
- **Dependencies**: [C{YY}, ...]
- **Tags**: {comma-separated}

Heuristic (logic/solution/heuristics.md)

## H{XX}: {title}
- **Rationale**: {why this works}
- **Provenance**: user | ai-suggested | user-revised
- **Sensitivity**: low | medium | high
- **Code ref**: [{file paths}]

Observation (staging/observations.yaml)

- id: O{XX}
  timestamp: "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM"
  provenance: user | ai-suggested | ai-executed
  content: "{raw observation}"
  context: "{what was happening}"
  potential_type: claim | heuristic | decision | unknown
  promoted: false

Session Record (trace/sessions/YYYY-MM-DD_NNN.yaml)

session:
  id: "YYYY-MM-DD_NNN"
  timestamp: "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM"
  summary: "{one-line summary of what happened}"

events_logged:
  - type: decision | experiment | dead_end | pivot | claim | heuristic | observation
    id: "{N/C/H/O}{XX}"
    provenance: user | ai-suggested | ai-executed | user-revised
    summary: "{what}"

ai_actions:
  - action: "{what AI did}"
    provenance: ai-executed
    files_changed: ["{paths}"]

claims_touched:
  - id: C{XX}
    action: created | advanced | weakened | confirmed
    provenance: user | ai-suggested

open_threads:
  - "{what needs follow-up}"

ai_suggestions_pending:
  - "{unconfirmed AI suggestions from this session}"

Initialization (if ara/ does not exist)

Create the full directory structure and seed files automatically. Do not ask.

mkdir -p ara/{logic/solution,src/{configs,kernel},trace/sessions,evidence/{tables,figures},staging}

Then write:

ara/PAPER.md — root manifest (infer title, authors, venue from project context)
ara/trace/sessions/session_index.yaml — sessions: []
ara/trace/exploration_tree.yaml — tree: []
ara/staging/observations.yaml — observations: []
ara/logic/claims.md — # Claims
ara/logic/problem.md — # Problem
ara/logic/solution/heuristics.md — # Heuristics
ara/evidence/README.md — # Evidence Index

Maturity Tracker (runs during epilogue)

While reviewing staging/observations.yaml:

3+ observations on same topic → promote to appropriate layer (mark ai-suggested)
Observation with experimental evidence → promote to evidence/
Observation contradicting a claim → flag: 
Stale observations (3+ sessions) → flag with stale: true

Procedure

Read existing ara/ files to get current state (IDs, claims, tree).
Scan the full conversation for research-significant events.
Classify each event and assign provenance.
Append new entries to the correct files. Update existing entries if status changed.
Create session record at ara/trace/sessions/YYYY-MM-DD_NNN.yaml.
Append session to ara/trace/sessions/session_index.yaml.
Run maturity tracker on staging area.
Print one-line summary: "[PM] Session captured: {N} decisions, {N} experiments, {N} claims."

Rules

Never run during a task — only as epilogue after the user's request is done.
Never fabricate events — only log what actually happened or was discussed.
Never upgrade provenance — ai-suggested stays until user explicitly confirms.
Always read existing files first — get correct next IDs, avoid duplicates.
Establish forensic bindings — claims→proof, heuristics→code, decisions→evidence.
Append, don't overwrite — add new entries, never replace existing content.
Keep YAML valid — validate structure after writes.

Reference Files

For detailed protocol and taxonomy specifications, load on demand:

references/event-taxonomy.md — Full classification of research-significant events
references/provenance-tags.md — Provenance tag semantics and edge cases
references/session-protocol.md — Step-by-step session recording protocol

Repository: Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs
Path: 22-agent-native-research-artifact/research-manager/SKILL.md
Commit: 773a529

Last updated: about 11 hours ago
First committed: 3 months ago

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.