CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ara-research-manager

Records research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilogue — never during execution — to maintain a faithful, auditable trace of how a research project actually evolved.

70

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable and well-structured with real, clearly signaled reference files, but loses conciseness to duplicated workflow/rule sections and lacks an explicit validation checkpoint in the batch-write procedure. Tightening the redundancy and promoting validation into the procedure flow would lift the weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

Collapse the overlapping 'How You Work' and 'Procedure' sections into a single sequenced workflow, and state 'never during execution' once to remove triplicated repetition.

Promote YAML validation into the procedure as an explicit numbered checkpoint with a fix-and-retry feedback loop (e.g. 'Validate structure; if invalid, fix and re-run before reporting') rather than only mentioning it in Rules.

Move the full node-type field reference or the maturity-tracker rules into a reference file if they grow, keeping SKILL.md focused on the overview and core procedure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with templates and structures rather than concept padding, but redundancy costs tokens — 'How You Work' and 'Procedure' describe the same process, and 'never during execution' is repeated across the CRITICAL section, description, and Rules.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable guidance: a concrete directory layout, an exact `mkdir -p ara/...` command, and copy-paste YAML/markdown templates with required fields per node and entry type.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The procedure is clearly sequenced (8 numbered steps), but for a batch multi-file write operation validation is buried in Rules ('Keep YAML valid — validate structure after writes') rather than presented as an explicit checkpoint with a fix-and-retry feedback loop, which caps clarity at 2.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md serves as a concise overview with a well-signaled 'Reference Files' section linking one level deep to three real files (event-taxonomy.md, provenance-tags.md, session-protocol.md), each labeled with its scope.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, third-person, and clearly answers both what the skill does and when to invoke it, with explicit trigger guidance and a distinct niche. It is a strong, well-targeted description with no padding or over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Enumerates multiple concrete actions — 'scanning conversation history... to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with... provenance tags' — matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly states both what it does (records provenance, extracts events, writes to ara/) and when to use it ('Use as a session epilogue — never during execution'), satisfying the what-AND-when anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural research-process vocabulary a user would say — 'coding or research session', 'decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, pivots', 'research provenance', 'auditable trace' — giving good keyword coverage rather than only jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche — post-task provenance recording into a dedicated ara/ directory — and the 'never during execution' constraint distinguishes it from in-flight skills, making wrong-skill triggering unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.