wpa-enterprise-eap

WPA/WPA2/WPA3-Enterprise (802.1X/EAP) rogue-RADIUS evil-twin for MSCHAPv2 capture, GTC downgrade, and PEAP relay. MSCHAPv2 capture equals a NetNTLM hash — the primary wireless on-ramp to Active Directory.

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./packages/decepticon/decepticon/skills/standard/wireless/wpa-enterprise-eap/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-structured offensive-wireless runbook with executable commands end-to-end and strong gating/verification via the RoE HARD STOP and ZFP sections. Conciseness and workflow-clarity are strong but not maximal, with minor room for tighter inline checkpoints.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'if the RoE gate is not satisfied, stop and report to the operator — do not proceed' feedback loop at the HARD STOP so the validation is an inline checkpoint rather than a separate block.

Tighten the opening blockquote and a few explanatory code comments (e.g., the GTC-downgrade paragraph) to the essential operational detail to lift conciseness toward 5.

Consider extracting the kg_add_node evidence schema into a references/ file referenced one level deep, which would let progressive disclosure reach 5 and shorten the main body.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Dense, command-first runbook that assumes Claude's competence; the opening blockquote and inline comments are operationally relevant rather than generic padding, with only minor trims possible.	4 / 5
Actionability	Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands throughout (airodump-ng, tshark, eaphammer with exact flags, hostapd-wpe, asleap, hashcat -m 5600, wpa_sycophant, berate_ap, bettercap) plus a complete kg_add_node evidence snippet covering the common cases.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Clearly sequenced recon → rogue AP → crack/relay → post-access flow with an explicit RoE HARD STOP pre-flight gate and a ZFP success-verification section; withheld from 5 because checkpoints sit alongside rather than inline as fix/retry feedback loops within each step.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized single-file runbook with clearly labeled sections and a one-level-deep References list (external tool URLs + sibling skills); no bundle files exist to split further, and the evidence schema is reasonably inline rather than buried.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-targeted description for a narrow offensive-wireless niche, with strong technical trigger terms and low conflict risk. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' clause, which caps completeness at 3.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming the trigger scenarios (e.g., 'Use when targeting WPA/WPA2/WPA3-Enterprise networks for credential capture or PEAP relay').

Mention the offline-crack and hostile-portal paths in the description so capability coverage is comprehensive, not just the capture/downgrade/relay techniques.

Include the layperson terms 'Wi-Fi' or 'wireless' alongside the protocol keywords so the description reads naturally beyond a specialist audience.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (WPA/WPA2/WPA3-Enterprise, 802.1X/EAP) and several concrete actions — 'MSCHAPv2 capture, GTC downgrade, and PEAP relay' plus 'rogue-RADIUS evil-twin' — but omits other capabilities covered in the body (offline crack, hostile portal), leaving minor gaps.	4 / 5
Completeness	The 'what' is clear (rogue-RADIUS evil-twin for MSCHAPv2 capture / GTC downgrade / PEAP relay) but there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause; the second sentence only weakly implies when, so per the cap completeness stays at 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Strong technical keyword coverage a wireless pentester would naturally say (WPA-Enterprise, 802.1X/EAP, MSCHAPv2, PEAP, RADIUS, evil-twin, NetNTLM, Active Directory), though generic user-facing terms like 'Wi-Fi'/'wireless' appear only weakly.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear niche (enterprise 802.1X/EAP credential capture) with distinct triggers that do not meaningfully overlap with the related open/PSK rogue-AP or deauth skills.	5 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: PurpleAILAB/Decepticon
Path: packages/decepticon/decepticon/skills/standard/wireless/wpa-enterprise-eap/SKILL.md
Commit: 0cf691e

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.