Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is highly actionable with concrete templates and a clear, well-guarded workflow, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. Its main weaknesses are mild redundancy in role definitions and the absence of any progressive-disclosure structure despite the file's length.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicate role definitions: keep either the intro bullet list or the '四个角色定位' table, not both, to tighten conciseness.
Consider extracting the prompt template and output-format template into a referenced file (e.g. references/templates.md) and signaling it from the body, which would both reduce length and add one-level-deep progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly operational and free of generic concept explanations, but the four roles are defined twice — as a bullet list in the intro (lines 13–16) and again in the '四个角色定位' table (lines 55–60) — so not every token earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready sub-agent prompt template, a concrete output-format template, and specific per-role guidance, giving fully executable, specific direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step execution flow is clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints and guardrails (clarify-before-convene, write-stance-first, 前提核查, anti-bias rules that treat dual opposition as a real signal), functioning as feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the skill is a single monolithic ~190-line file with no external references; since it exceeds 50 lines it does not qualify for the simple-skill auto-3 and has no file-based disclosure to reward. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |