Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, concise skill with concrete prompt and output templates and a clear sequenced workflow; the main gap is that synthesis-stage validation/feedback checkpoints are implied rather than explicit, and a little role-description redundancy could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification checkpoint after step 5: confirm all three sub-agents returned before synthesizing, and re-spawn any that are missing or off-role.
Remove the redundant role-definition table in '四个角色定位' since each role is already introduced in the opening list, or merge the two to cut tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean, assumes Claude's competence, and uses compact tables and templates rather than padding; a few explanatory sentences (e.g., restating what each role does in the table after the intro list) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready sub-agent prompt template and a concrete output markdown template, giving executable guidance; minor gaps are that role-specific emphasis is described rather than templated and there are no exact spawn mechanics. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with numbered stages and explicit anti-bias guardrails; the final step ('等所有subagent返回') and persistence rules add checkpoints, but explicit validation/feedback-loops for the synthesis step are implicit rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized single-file skill with clear section headers (使用时机, 角色定位, 执行流程, 持久化, 反模式) and no bundle files needed; content is appropriately scoped to one level with no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |