Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and its workflows are clearly sequenced with explicit validation and recovery loops. The main weaknesses are verbosity from repeated gotchas and the lack of a progressive-disclosure bundle, keeping large advanced reference material inline.
Suggestions
Tighten the repeated gotchas and Supabase-parity framing into a single consolidated section to reduce token redundancy.
Extract the PG/pgstore RLS SQL and bucket-creation detail into a references/ file (e.g. PG_STORAGE.md) and link to it from a concise summary, enabling progressive disclosure.
Remove the version-number field from body-derived claims where it does not aid action, or isolate time-sensitive notes in a clearly labeled section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly actionable but padded with repeated gotchas and the Supabase-parity analogy restated across multiple sections, adding tokens beyond what Claude needs; it avoids explaining basic concepts but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready SDK code for upload, temp URLs, delete, download, progress, and error handling, plus concrete SQL RLS policies and specific MCP tool/action invocations. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes (local dev recipe, bucket-existence prerequisite, PG upload flow) are explicitly numbered with validation checkpoints and error-recovery feedback loops (e.g. stop on STORAGE_NOT_EXIST, inspect DevTools codes, re-check then retry). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections, but it is a single monolithic SKILL.md with no references/scripts/assets bundle files and no offloaded reference docs; substantial advanced detail (RLS SQL, PG parity tables) is inlined rather than split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |