arxiv

Use this skill whenever the user wants to find, read, cite, track, download, or analyze academic papers on arXiv. That includes: searching papers by topic, author, category, or arXiv ID; fetching abstracts or full metadata; generating BibTeX citations; downloading PDFs; listing the latest submissions in a field (e.g. cs.AI daily digest); checking a paper's citation impact; finding who cites a paper, what it references, or related-paper recommendations. Trigger on mentions of 'arXiv', an arXiv ID (e.g. 2601.02780 or hep-th/0601001), an arxiv.org URL, 'paper search', 'literature review', 'find papers about X', 'cite this paper', or 'what's new in cs.LG'.

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable and well-structured, with executable commands for every goal and clear multi-step research workflows backed by a real bundled script. Its main weakness is mild verbosity in the Raw API Reference and the absence of explicit validation/retry checkpoints for rate-limited or download-dependent workflows.

Suggestions

Tighten or partially externalize the 'Raw API Reference' section (field prefixes, boolean syntax, parameter tables) into a references/ file, since scripts/arxiv.py already encapsulates most of it and the body should stay an overview.

Add an explicit retry/backoff checkpoint for HTTP 429 rate-limit responses in the research workflows, especially for the 'cites'/'similar' Semantic Scholar calls, rather than only noting the script exits on 429.

Add a brief verification step after `download` (e.g. confirm the PDF exists and is non-empty) before recommending it be passed to a PDF-processing skill.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is largely lean — a command table, terse workflow lists, and minimal prose assuming Claude's competence — but the 'Raw API Reference' section re-derives field prefixes, boolean syntax, and parameter lists that the bundled script already encapsulates, adding tokens that could be trimmed. It is noticeably above the 'mostly efficient' anchor (3) but not perfectly lean, so a 4 fits best.	4 / 5
Actionability	Nearly every goal maps to a copy-paste-ready command (e.g. `python scripts/arxiv.py search "GRPO reinforcement learning" --max 10 --sort date`) and the raw-API section gives executable `curl` examples covering common cases, matching the anchor for fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The three 'Recommended Research Workflows' are clearly sequenced with numbered steps and named commands (e.g. 'search... then cites ID --max 5 for citation counts'), but the multi-step download-then-read path and rate-limit handling lack an explicit validation/retry checkpoint, so it sits just below the explicit-validation anchor at 5.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Structure is well organized with a Quick Start table, workflows, raw API reference, and an 'Important Details' section, and the one bundle file (scripts/arxiv.py) is real and clearly referenced. It does not reach 5 because the inlined Raw API Reference is substantial enough that it could plausibly live in a separate reference file, leaving a minor organization gap.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: it concisely states a comprehensive set of concrete capabilities, uses third-person directive voice, and provides explicit, varied trigger phrases including arXiv-specific ID and URL patterns. It cleanly answers both 'what' and 'when' with minimal conflict risk.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — 'searching papers by topic, author, category, or arXiv ID; fetching abstracts or full metadata; generating BibTeX citations; downloading PDFs; listing the latest submissions... checking a paper's citation impact; finding who cites a paper, what it references, or related-paper recommendations' — covering the skill comprehensively, matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions with comprehensive coverage.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both 'what' (the enumerated capability actions) and 'when' with a clear 'Use this skill whenever...' clause plus concrete 'Trigger on...' phrases, matching the anchor for clearly and explicitly answering both what AND when with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Comprehensive natural trigger terms including 'arXiv', arXiv ID formats ('2601.02780 or hep-th/0601001'), 'arxiv.org URL', 'paper search', 'literature review', 'find papers about X', 'cite this paper', and 'what's new in cs.LG' — covers synonyms and concrete ID/URL forms users would naturally say.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The arXiv-specific niche is unambiguous — anchored to arXiv IDs, arxiv.org URLs, and Semantic Scholar citation data — with distinct triggers that would not collide with other skills, matching the anchor for a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk.	5 / 5
	Total	20 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code
Path: packages/opencode/src/skill/builtin/.bundle/arxiv/SKILL.md
Commit: ec3f989

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.