CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

arxiv

Use this skill whenever the user wants to find, read, cite, track, download, or analyze academic papers on arXiv. That includes: searching papers by topic, author, category, or arXiv ID; fetching abstracts or full metadata; generating BibTeX citations; downloading PDFs; listing the latest submissions in a field (e.g. cs.AI daily digest); checking a paper's citation impact; finding who cites a paper, what it references, or related-paper recommendations. Trigger on mentions of 'arXiv', an arXiv ID (e.g. 2601.02780 or hep-th/0601001), an arxiv.org URL, 'paper search', 'literature review', 'find papers about X', 'cite this paper', or 'what's new in cs.LG'.

75

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable and token-efficient, with executable commands and well-organized sections backed by a real bundled script. The main gap is the absence of explicit validation/retry checkpoints in the batch workflows, which caps workflow clarity at 2.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the multi-step workflows, e.g. after `download` verify the PDF exists and is non-empty, and after `new`/`search` confirm result counts before proceeding to `bibtex` or `get`.

Include a concrete retry/backoff feedback loop for HTTP 429 in the workflows rather than only noting that the script exits on rate limits, since batch citation lookups (`cites`/`refs`) are multi-request.

Consider moving the Raw API Reference into a separate reference file so SKILL.md stays a pure overview that points one level deep to advanced details.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes competence — no explanation of what arXiv is or how libraries work — with a compact command table and scoped sections where every token earns its place, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands in the Quick Start table plus concrete curl examples with exact field prefixes and parameters, matching the score-3 anchor for fully executable guidance.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The literature-review and deep-dive workflows are clearly numbered and sequenced, but they lack explicit validation checkpoints or retry feedback loops despite batch operations (downloading multiple papers, listing latest submissions), which caps the score at 2.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well organized into clearly signaled sections (Quick Start, Reading, Workflows, Raw API, Details) with the single bundled scripts/arxiv.py referenced and present; no separate reference files are needed, so well-organized sections satisfy the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: it enumerates concrete capabilities, supplies natural trigger terms users would actually say, and pairs a clear 'what' with an explicit 'when' clause. It is distinctive to its arXiv niche with negligible conflict risk.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists many specific concrete actions such as 'find, read, cite, track, download, or analyze', 'generating BibTeX citations', 'downloading PDFs', and 'checking a paper's citation impact', matching the score-3 anchor that lists multiple specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (the full capability list) and 'when' via the 'Trigger on mentions of...' clause with concrete triggers, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Provides strong coverage of natural terms a user would say — 'arXiv', an arXiv ID, an arxiv.org URL, 'paper search', 'literature review', 'find papers about X', 'cite this paper', and 'what's new in cs.LG'.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (academic papers on arXiv) with distinctive triggers (arXiv IDs, arxiv.org URLs, category digests) unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.