Use this skill whenever the user wants to find, read, cite, track, download, or analyze academic papers on arXiv. That includes: searching papers by topic, author, category, or arXiv ID; fetching abstracts or full metadata; generating BibTeX citations; downloading PDFs; listing the latest submissions in a field (e.g. cs.AI daily digest); checking a paper's citation impact; finding who cites a paper, what it references, or related-paper recommendations. Trigger on mentions of 'arXiv', an arXiv ID (e.g. 2601.02780 or hep-th/0601001), an arxiv.org URL, 'paper search', 'literature review', 'find papers about X', 'cite this paper', or 'what's new in cs.LG'.
75
93%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
The required workflow fetches outsider-authored paper metadata/abstract and Semantic Scholar JSON (e.g., arXiv Atom `<summary>`/`<title>` and abstracts) at runtime via `urllib.request.urlopen`, then prints/emits those free-text fields into the agent/CLI output that the LLM can ingest (potential indirect prompt injection).
ff87d47
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.