Canonical repo-local DESIGN.md workflow for product, UI/UX, and frontend decision source of truth
58
68%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./plugins/oh-my-codex/skills/design/SKILL.mdUse $design to discover product and UI evidence, close only design-critical context gaps, and create or refresh the repository’s durable DESIGN.md contract. It is a maintained design brief, not a pixel-matching loop or one-off critique.
Shared operating, delegation, state, hook, team, cancellation, and verification invariants live in templates/AGENTS.md. Follow that source instead of duplicating its rules here.
$ralph, a designer lane, or implementation.Do not use it for visual-reference implementation matching (use $visual-ralph), screenshot comparison alone, or backend/infrastructure work without user-facing design impact.
$visual-ralph$design owns product goals, users, information architecture, visual language, components, accessibility, constraints, and open questions in DESIGN.md. $visual-ralph owns implementation against an approved visual reference or live-URL baseline, measured verdicts, and pixel-diff evidence. Run $design first when both are needed; DESIGN.md supports but does not replace the visual verdict target.
Inspect and cite existing DESIGN.md, design/UX/frontend docs, README/specs/issues, routes/pages/layouts/components/stories, theme and token files, assets, screenshots/mockups, Storybook or Playwright baselines, and accessibility/responsive/i18n/platform constraints. Separate observations from inferences; note absent evidence.
Ask concise questions only for gaps the repository cannot resolve: users/jobs, goals/non-goals, brand personality and forbidden aesthetics, primary flows, accessibility/device/browser targets, or unavailable assets/references. If answers are unavailable, record explicit assumptions and open questions rather than blocking.
DESIGN.mdPreserve useful content, remove contradictions, mark unknowns, and keep decisions actionable. The root file must contain these sections:
Status (Draft | Active | Needs refresh), date, product surfaces, evidence reviewed.
Personality, trust signals, avoid.
Goals, non-goals, success signals.
Primary personas, user jobs, contexts of use.
Navigation, routes/screens, content hierarchy.
Principles and tradeoffs.
Color, typography, spacing, shape/elevation, motion, imagery/iconography.
Existing/new components, variants/states, token ownership.
Target standard, keyboard/focus, contrast, semantics, reduced motion/sensory concerns.
Breakpoints/devices, layout adaptations, touch/hover differences.
Loading, empty, error, success, disabled, offline/slow network where applicable.
Tone, terminology, microcopy rules.
Framework/styling, tokens, performance, compatibility, test/screenshot expectations.
[ ] question, owner, and impact.
Before UI decisions, cite relevant DESIGN.md sections, reuse documented components/tokens, and update the file or add an open question when implementation exposes a contradiction. Do not invent a parallel design-system layer.
For normal frontend work, provide the relevant sections, repo evidence, and acceptance criteria. For visual-reference, image, or live-URL matching, hand off to $visual-ralph with the approved baseline and identify DESIGN.md as supporting context only.
Complete only when design docs/assets/components/screenshots were inspected or noted absent; missing context is answered, assumed, or listed; root DESIGN.md contains every required section; recommendations cite it; and any Visual Ralph handoff is clearly separated from design governance.
Task: {{ARGUMENTS}}
304fb3b
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.