Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow, concrete deliverable template, and an explicit completion checklist. The main improvement is making per-step validation checkpoints inline rather than relegating all verification to the closing checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, using terse imperatives and offloading shared invariants to AGENTS.md; minor redundancy between 'Use when', 'Do not use it for', and 'Relationship to $visual-ralph' keeps it just short of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, specific guidance — an exact list of evidence sources to inspect and a copy-paste-ready required-section template for DESIGN.md — with only minor gaps such as no worked example snippet. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Discover, Interview, Create/refresh, Apply, Handoff) is backed by an explicit completion checklist and a contradiction-feedback loop in step 4, though per-step validation is implied rather than framed as inline checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is clean with a single clearly-signaled one-level reference to templates/AGENTS.md and no nested/deep references; the inlined required-section template is long but legitimately belongs as the contract spec. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |