Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear sequenced workflow and validation checklist, but it carries verbosity in the comparison sections and keeps a large inline template rather than splitting it into a reference file.
Suggestions
Move the full DESIGN.md structure template into a references/ file (e.g. DESIGN_TEMPLATE.md) and summarize the required sections inline in SKILL.md.
Tighten the 'Relationship to $visual-ralph' and 'Do not use when' sections to the minimal distinguishing statements needed for routing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The prose is directive and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the relationship-to-$visual-ralph and do-not-use-when sections plus the inline template add length that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout: specific file-pattern discovery lists, focused interview prompts, a complete DESIGN.md section template, and an explicit completion checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with a validation-style completion checklist and an explicit contradiction-handling feedback loop in step 4 ('update DESIGN.md or add an open question before proceeding'). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but the ~80-line DESIGN.md template is inline with no reference files to offload detail, so content that could be split remains in SKILL.md. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |