Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The router is well-structured and concise with a clear sequenced protocol and explicit error-recovery feedback, but its progressive-disclosure design is undermined by missing bundle files: the manifest.yaml and static/core/*.md files it instructs Claude to load first do not exist, so the primary executable step cannot be followed as written.
Suggestions
Add the missing manifest.yaml and static/core/tools.md, static/core/routing-and-ops.md files referenced as always_load in Step 1, or correct the paths to point at files that actually exist — currently the first executable step cannot be followed.
Link the workflow files explicitly (e.g., [references/workflows/wf1-multi-source-search.md]) and clarify how workflow values like multi-source-search map to the wf1–wf6 filenames, since the manifest that is supposed to declare this mapping is absent.
Trim the 'Why this split' rationale section or relocate it to a maintenance note to tighten the router further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | A lean router that explicitly defers logic to fragments ('Do not try to apply the search logic from memory or from this router'). Not 5: the 'Why this split' section is minor over-explanation of design rationale that could be trimmed. Not 3: the body is otherwise efficient and assumes Claude's competence. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths and a specific 5-step protocol with explicit fallbacks ('fall back to manual generation from MCP-fetched metadata if a script fails twice'), but the primary Step 1 targets (manifest.yaml, static/core/tools.md, static/core/routing-and-ops.md) do not exist in the bundle, leaving the first executable load step un-followable. Not 4 due to this key gap. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequenced routing protocol with an explicit detection checkpoint ('State the detected workflow(s) in one short line before proceeding') and error-recovery feedback. Not 5: validation is fallback-oriented rather than output-verification, and there is no checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sound router concept with many real, well-signaled one-level references (references/source-tiers.md, references/dedup-engine.md, scripts/academic_search.py), but the central manifest.yaml and the always-load static/core/*.md files referenced in Step 1 are absent from the bundle, breaking navigation. Not 4 due to these missing critical references; not 2 because many references are real and the structure is genuinely a router, not a monolith. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |