nature-academic-search
Multi-source literature search, citation verification, strict independent other-citation audits, article-level citation metric tables, influential citer profiling with citation-context extraction, MeSH search strategy, citation file management (.nbib/.ris/.bib conversion), and reference management (BibTeX, related articles, ID conversion) via MCP tools (PubMed, CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, ScienceDirect). Use for coordinated literature workflows beyond one MCP call, including 文献检索、 查文献、找文献、文献综述检索、查论文、引文核对、参考文献管理、文献去重、 严格他引、他引判定、排除自引、谁引用了我的文章、引用我的文章的人有没有大牛、 院士引用、校长引用、院长引用、杰青引用、长江学者引用、Fellow引用、文章引用表、 指定文章引用数、严格他引数、整理成表格.
66
80%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/nature-academic-search/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
At runtime, the agent ingests outsider-provided free text in the user’s document for Workflow 2 “citation-verification” by parsing user-supplied document content (docx/tex/txt) via the Citation Parser before resolving citations.
- Repository
- Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
- Commit
3817cd1
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.