Design multi-agent systems (supervisor, swarm, pipeline) and tool schemas; find bottlenecks in run logs. Use whenever agents split work or a run is slow or costly. Not for Claude Code workflow files (workflow-builder).
87%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Design, schema-generate, and evaluate multi-agent systems with three deterministic tools. The scripts are the workflow — do not freehand an architecture when the planner can score one from requirements.
When NOT to use: Claude Code Workflow-tool automations → workflow-builder; single-agent workflow scaffolds → agent-workflow-designer; multi-agent fan-out at runtime → agenthub.
| Choose | When | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|
| Single agent | One bounded task, < ~5 tools | Don't add agents you don't need |
| Supervisor | Central decomposition, specialists report back | Supervisor becomes the bottleneck |
| Pipeline | Strictly sequential stages with handoffs | Rigid order; slowest stage gates throughput |
| Hierarchical | Multiple org layers, > ~8 agents | Communication overhead per level |
| Swarm | Parallel peers, fault tolerance over predictability | Hard to debug; needs consensus rules |
The planner applies this scoring deterministically — run it rather than picking by feel.
All paths relative to this skill folder. Each step's JSON output is the next step's design input.
Write a requirements JSON (copy assets/sample_system_requirements.json — keys: goal, tasks[], constraints{max_response_time, budget_per_task, concurrent_tasks}, team_size):
python3 agent_planner.py requirements.json --format json -o archEmits arch.json with architecture_design (pattern, agents, communication links), mermaid_diagram, and implementation_roadmap. Read architecture_design.pattern and the per-agent role list; present the mermaid diagram to the user.
Describe each agent's tools in plain JSON (copy assets/sample_tool_descriptions.json), then:
python3 tool_schema_generator.py tool_descriptions.json --validate -o toolsEmits tools.json (tool_schemas, validation_summary) plus provider-specific tools_anthropic.json / tools_openai.json. Gate: every tool must print ✓ Valid. Fix any invalid schema before proceeding — never hand an agent an unvalidated schema.
Once the system runs (or against assets/sample_execution_logs.json for a dry run):
python3 agent_evaluator.py execution_logs.json --detailed -o evalEmits eval.json with summary, agent_metrics, bottleneck_analysis, error_analysis, cost_breakdown, sla_compliance, and optimization_recommendations, plus split files (eval_errors.json, eval_recommendations.json).
The design is not done until:
tool_schema_generator.py --validate reports 0 invalid schemas.agent_evaluator.py on a pilot run reports 0 critical issues (the tool prints CRITICAL: N critical issues when found). If N > 0, apply the top item in eval_recommendations.json, re-run the pilot, and re-evaluate.expected_outputs/ to confirm the schema shape you're consuming hasn't drifted.references/agent_architecture_patterns.md — pattern trade-offs in depthreferences/tool_design_best_practices.md — schema, idempotency, error-handling rulesreferences/evaluation_methodology.md — metric definitions the evaluator implementsalirezarezvani/claude-skills
08cd8a9
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.