Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean, well-sequenced skill writing with explicit validation gates and a retry feedback loop. Its one material defect is that the workflow's core commands invoke scripts and an expected_outputs/ directory that are missing from the bundle, making the otherwise copy-paste-ready workflow non-executable as shipped.
Suggestions
Bundle the three invoked scripts (agent_planner.py, tool_schema_generator.py, agent_evaluator.py) or correct their paths (e.g. scripts/agent_planner.py) so the documented commands actually run from the skill folder.
Add the expected_outputs/ directory referenced in step 4.3, or remove that verification step, so the verification loop is actionable.
Since progressive_disclosure verification flagged the dangling paths, add a brief note in the Workflow section stating where the scripts live if they are provided outside the skill folder.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive ("The scripts are the workflow — do not freehand an architecture when the planner can score one from requirements"), uses a compact decision table instead of prose, and explains nothing Claude already knows — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete with flags, inputs, and output contracts ("python3 agent_planner.py requirements.json --format json -o arch"), but the three invoked scripts (agent_planner.py, tool_schema_generator.py, agent_evaluator.py) and expected_outputs/ are absent from the bundle, so the commands are not executable as shipped. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly numbered steps with an explicit gate ("Gate: every tool must print ✓ Valid") and a genuine feedback loop ("If N > 0, apply the top item in eval_recommendations.json, re-run the pilot, and re-evaluate") — the strongest anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview is clear with well-signaled one-level-deep references and point-of-use asset links, and all references/ and assets/ paths verified to exist; however, scoring against the actual bundle reveals four referenced paths (three scripts and expected_outputs/) that do not exist. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |