Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized forcing-questions skill with concrete commands, a clear workflow, and a useful output template. The main improvements are tightening minor redundancy and making external script references more robust.
Suggestions
Consolidate the cs-ciso-advisor cross-check so it appears in only one place (e.g. Workflow or Routing) to reduce redundancy.
Make the analyzer script invocations more robust by resolving the fragile '../../../c-level-advisor/...' relative paths or documenting the expected working directory.
Trim the output-format template to the essential fields, or move the full template into a referenced file to improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient with no concept over-explanation, but the large output-format template and repeated cs-ciso cross-check (in Q6, Workflow step 3, and Routing) could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (the two analyzer scripts) and a copy-paste-ready output template, but the script paths use fragile relative '../../../' references and the questions are guiding rather than fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step Workflow is clearly sequenced and the SHIP/SHARPEN/BLOCK verdict acts as a terminal checkpoint; this is a review (non-destructive) skill so heavy validation checkpoints are not required, leaving only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (scripts, related skill, SLO architect, routing), though the references point to paths outside the skill bundle rather than to local bundle files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |