Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A detailed, highly actionable prompt-template skill with a clear sequenced workflow and concrete output spec. Its weaknesses are mild verbosity in the conceptual framing and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure of reference material.
Suggestions
Trim the conceptual framing in the intro and the "You are a growth strategist..." persona line, which a capable model does not need.
Consider moving the canonical loop-type taxonomy and the metrics/branching-factor reference into a separate reference file linked from the body, so the main template stays lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient domain-specific structure (loop taxonomy, metrics, anti-plays), but the conceptual intro ("Funnels are useful for diagnosis but dangerous for strategy...") and persona framing add explanation a capable model does not need. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance: canonical loop types with triggers, exact metrics (branching factor thresholds, a conversion-table example), named break types, and a fixed output format. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced five-step process (Identify → Measure → Find breaks → Assess interactions → Recommend) with a defined output checklist; the task is analytical rather than destructive/batch, so no validate-fix-retry loop is required. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well organized with clear section headers and a numbered step hierarchy, but it is a long (>50 line) monolithic document with no external references to offload the detailed loop taxonomy or metrics reference material. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |