Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction skill whose prompt template gives concrete questions and audit structures. It loses points for verbosity, lack of validation checkpoints, and absence of progressive disclosure beyond a monolithic inline template.
Suggestions
Trim the motivational intro and redundant framing lines to tighten token efficiency.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint after each branch (e.g. 'Confirm: list the real-signal evidence vs. false-signal compliments you collected') to strengthen workflow clarity.
Consider splitting the long prompt template into a references file so SKILL.md stays an overview with a one-level-deep pointer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a mostly efficient prompt template with no padding about basic concepts, but the motivational intro ('Everyone says they'd use your product...') and repeated framing add length that could be trimmed without losing signal. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction-only skill: concrete sample questions, a structured Question Audit table with verdict/problem/rewrite columns, named failure patterns, and explicit rewrite instructions for each bad question. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly separated input branches (idea, draft questions, transcripts) with a timed conversation-plan sequence, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops — the 'confirm what you learned' summary is implicit rather than an enforced checkpoint. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well-sectioned but is a single ~140-line inline prompt template with no bundle files or one-level-deep references; the cross-skill mentions (craft-discovery-synthesis, jobs-to-be-done) are skill links, not bundled detail files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |