Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a highly actionable, well-sequenced diagnostic workflow with concrete tool calls, validation checkpoints, and a quality-gated synthesis phase. Its only weaknesses are mild verbosity in the conceptual sections and a monolithic structure that could offload reference material into bundle files.
Suggestions
Move the RICE impact/confidence/effort anchor tables and the opportunity-structure template into a references/ file (e.g. RICE.md), keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with a one-level link.
Tighten the 'Core Principle: Enrichment Analysis > Error Logs' section — the error-rate-vs-failure-rate point is restated in 2e; state it once and reference forward.
Consider collapsing the per-phase tool-call budgets and param tables into a single quick-reference table to reduce repeated procedural prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient procedural guidance with specific tool calls, budgets, and tables rather than padding; the 'Core Principle' section earns its place by explaining domain-specific enrichment logic Claude would not already know. A few explanatory passages (e.g., restating 'error rate ≠ failure rate' across sections) could be trimmed, so it sits just below the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: concrete tool calls with explicit parameters ('search' with 'isOfficial: true, sortOrder: "viewCount", limitPerQuery: 15'), call budgets ('10-15 tool calls'), an enriched-field reference table, and a copy-paste-ready opportunity template with a RICE formula and numeric anchors. Matches the fully-executable top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six phases are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints — a RICE quality gate (>= 100), 'Verify currency' deployment checks, multi-source evidence requirements, and a Troubleshooting section for error recovery. Read-only analysis so the destructive-cap does not apply; matches the explicit-validation-and-feedback-loops anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear phase headers, tables, and a template block, and no nested/deep references. But it is a ~250-line monolith with no bundle files, and the detailed RICE anchor tables and opportunity-structure template could plausibly live in separate reference files, so it stops just short of the ideal overview-with-one-level-references anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |