Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a well-structured prompt template for support feedback prioritization with clear steps and useful placeholder variables. However, it lacks executable specificity — there are no concrete MCP tool calls, the scoring model is underspecified, and validation checkpoints are absent for a workflow involving four external integrations. The content reads more like a prompt recipe than a technical skill with actionable, copy-paste-ready guidance.
Suggestions
Define the base scoring formula explicitly (e.g., base_score = ARR_weight + category_weight) so the multipliers in Step 4 are actionable rather than abstract.
Add concrete MCP tool invocation examples (e.g., specific Intercom MCP query syntax, Slack MCP channel listing commands) so Claude knows exactly which tools to call.
Add a validation checkpoint after Step 1 (e.g., 'Confirm signal count and date range before proceeding') and after Step 3 (e.g., 'Report how many customers were matched vs unmatched in CRM') to catch integration failures early.
Link or provide the referenced 'analyze-feedback' skill and consider extracting the scoring rubric into a separate reference file for cleaner progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The introductory paragraph restates what the prompt template already explains ('reads all of it, classifies every signal, enriches each item with ARR'). The Tips section adds useful context but the overall framing could be tighter. Some redundancy between the description and the body. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a structured prompt template with clear steps and placeholder variables, but it lacks executable code or concrete MCP tool invocations. The scoring model in Step 4 references 'multiply score by ×3' without defining the base score or formula, making it ambiguous. There are no actual API calls, tool names, or command examples — it's a prompt template rather than executable guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps are clearly sequenced and logically ordered, and there's a graceful handling of CRM-not-found cases. However, there are no validation checkpoints — no step to verify data completeness, confirm MCP connections are working, or validate the output before saving to Drive. For a multi-step workflow involving multiple external integrations, this is a notable gap. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is reasonably organized with sections (Prompt Template, Setup, Placeholders, Tips), but everything is in a single file with no references to supporting materials. The prompt template itself is quite long and could benefit from being separated or having the scoring rubric in a reference file. The mention of 'analyze-feedback' skill is a nice cross-reference but isn't linked. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |