Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with real, verified scripts and a clearly sequenced workflow, and its progressive-disclosure signaling (per-reference "何时读取" notes) is strong. Its main weaknesses are structural redundancy across sections and a missing validation/confirmation checkpoint before the irreversible multi-platform publish step.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the platform categorization, content length/format, and cover-ratio specs — state them once and reference the relevant guide elsewhere instead of repeating them in 步骤二, 分支B, and 注意事项.
Add an explicit pre-publish validation checkpoint to the standard flow (e.g. preview content, confirm platforms, and verify the draft before pushing live), so the destructive/batch publish operation has a feedback loop and workflow clarity can exceed 3.
Collapse the three overlapping 使用示例 sections into a single set of end-to-end examples, or cross-reference 操作步骤 instead of restating the same commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly operational rather than concept-explaining, but it is noticeably redundant: the platform categorization and length/format/cover specs are repeated 3-4 times (步骤二, 分支B, 注意事项) and the three 使用示例 sections restate 操作步骤 with the same bash commands, so it could be tightened considerably. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, real, executable bash commands for all three scripts with documented arguments (filter_topics.py, search_images.py, publish.py), verified to exist; minor gaps remain in placeholder content values ("HTML内容") and the "需配置接口" caveat that contradicts the already-configured script endpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step sequence (选题筛选 → 内容生成 → 一键发布) and branches A/B/C are clearly laid out, but publishing to public platforms is a hard-to-reverse batch/outward operation with no explicit pre-publish validation or confirmation checkpoint in the standard flow, capping workflow clarity at 3 per the destructive/batch guideline. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with well-signaled one-level-deep references (the 资源索引 lists each references/*.md and scripts/*.py with a "何时读取" annotation, all verified to exist), but some content that belongs in the reference files (接口配置 details, the full platform list) is duplicated inline and the platform list itself is repeated. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |