attract-talent-to-organization

Use when recruiting capable individuals or rebuilding a team after setbacks. Demonstrates how symbolic gestures of respect, generous incentives, and shared hardship attract talent from afar, following Warring States recruitment principles.

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_082/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise and well-organized with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit verification steps, but its guidance is abstract strategic principle rather than concrete executable actions, limiting actionability.

Suggestions

Add an actionable template for each step, e.g. a short script or fill-in prompt for the symbolic recognition gesture and the incentive package, to lift actionability.

Give one concrete worked example (e.g., a leader rebuilding an engineering team after attrition) showing the steps applied end-to-end.

Tie each verification item to a measurable signal (e.g., 'at least one public recognition event held and documented') so the checks are objectively passable.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean — numbered steps and a short verification list with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. Not a 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten.	3 / 3
Actionability	Concrete-seeming details like 'build them a residence, address them as a teacher' and 'mourn the dead, comfort orphans' appear, but the guidance is abstract strategic principle rather than executable, applicable instructions, matching 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'. Not a 3 because nothing is copy-paste ready or directly executable; not a 1 because specific illustrative actions are given.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Five numbered steps give a clear sequence and a dedicated 'Verification' section lists three explicit validation checks, matching 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps'. Not a 2 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit or missing.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and has no external references, with well-organized sections (Overview, Steps, Expected Outcomes, Verification), so per the simple-skills note it qualifies for a 3. Not a 2 because organization is clear and there are no nested or poorly-signaled references.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has an explicit 'Use when' trigger and clearly states its purpose, but its capabilities are framed abstractly and the 'Warring States recruitment principles' jargon weakens trigger-term naturalness and distinctiveness.

Suggestions

Replace 'Warring States recruitment principles' with natural user-facing terms like 'hiring, team building, or rebuilding a team after layoffs or departures'.

Add concrete actions the skill performs (e.g., 'drafts a respectful outreach plan, designs incentive packages, plans a symbolic recognition gesture') to lift specificity.

Sharpen the trigger so it is less likely to conflict with generic team-building skills, e.g. 'Use when rebuilding a depleted team or attracting high-caliber hires through respect-based, incentive-driven outreach.'

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Quotes 'symbolic gestures of respect, generous incentives, and shared hardship' name the domain and approaches, but these are abstract levers rather than concrete executable actions, matching 'names domain and some actions, but not comprehensive'. Not a 3 because no multiple specific concrete actions are listed; not a 1 because the domain and methods are named rather than vague.	2 / 3
Completeness	The 'Use when recruiting capable individuals or rebuilding a team after setbacks' clause gives the trigger, and the rest states what it does ('attract talent from afar'), explicitly answering both what and when. Not a 2 because the when-clause is explicit rather than implied.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	'recruiting capable individuals or rebuilding a team after setbacks' are reasonably natural phrases, but the historical framing 'Warring States recruitment principles' is jargon users would rarely say, matching 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations'. Not a 3 due to thin coverage of natural term variations; not a 1 because usable recruitment triggers are present.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The talent-recruitment-via-symbolic-respect niche is somewhat specific, but it could overlap with general team-building or HR skills, matching 'somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills'. Not a 3 because the triggers are not distinct enough to rule out confusion; not a 1 because it is not purely generic.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_082/SKILL.md
Commit: 79c272f

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.