Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-organized, lean instructional skill with concrete examples and a real verification checklist, suited to its simple single-purpose scope. Its main limitation is qualitative actionability and the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; minor redundancy between steps (e.g., 'Honor a worthy person' and 'Lower your status to show sincerity') and the lightly fluffy 'Expected Outcomes' section keep it just below the every-token-earns-its-place anchor of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance with worked examples ('build them a residence, address them as a teacher', 'mourn the dead, comfort orphans'), so it clears the executable-guidance bar; it is not 5 because guidance is qualitative rather than fully crisp/spec'd. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five steps are clearly sequenced and a dedicated 'Verification' section provides explicit checkpoints (e.g., confirm a symbolic demonstration occurs before broader recruitment); it is not 5 because there is no explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop for error recovery. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, with no need for external references, and is organized into clear sections (Overview, Steps, Expected Outcomes, Verification), which meets the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |