Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow and a verification section. It would reach the top band by adding an explicit error-recovery/feedback loop and slightly more concrete phrasing for the more abstract steps.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop in the workflow (e.g., if the leader deflects or reacts badly, return to safer topics and re-demonstrate value before re-attempting escalation).
Tighten the more abstract steps with a concrete example phrase or signal, mirroring the Jiang Ziya/King Wen pattern used in step 4.
Inline a brief validation gate within the Steps list (e.g., 'Confirm an explicit invitation has been received before moving from external matters to internal politics') rather than only in the post-hoc Verification section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet steps with brief, purposeful glosses; no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, directive steps with a worked example ("e.g., Jiang Ziya and King Wen"), but the guidance is strategic rather than literal copy-paste and a few steps leave the exact phrasing implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step sequence with a gating step ("Wait for explicit invitation") and a final Verification checklist; missing an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop keeps it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, yet well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Steps, Key Principle, Warning, Expected Outcomes, Verification). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |