CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

court-communication-strategy

Use when advising rulers without direct confrontation. Presents options rather than demands (开陈其端令人主自择), times proposals for private audiences, and allows superiors to feel ownership of decisions.

61

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_228/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a clear, well-structured instruction-only skill with appropriate self-containment and a sensible step sequence. It is held back by mild redundancy, behavioral rather than tightly operational guidance, and a lack of inline validation checkpoints between workflow steps.

Suggestions

Collapse the redundant restating of the '开陈其端令人主自择' principle and merge overlapping bullets between Core Principles and the Present-the-Framework step to tighten conciseness.

Add inline validation/feedback checkpoints within the Steps (e.g., 'If the superior reacts negatively in court, stop and switch to a private audience or alternative timing') rather than only post-hoc verification.

Strengthen actionability by including a short concrete worked example of a framed multi-option proposal so the guidance reads as operational rather than purely behavioral.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is well-organized and free of explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the Overview and Core Principle #2 restate the frontmatter idiom, and several bullets overlap ('Present the framework' vs 'Present multiple possible approaches') or could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete tactical guidance exists ('Private audience when possible', 'Highlight implications of each path', 'Let the superior make the final choice'), but as instruction-only prose it stays somewhat behavioral and high-level rather than crisply operational with specific worked detail.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear 4-step sequence (Prepare, Choose Moment, Present Framework, Allow Decision) is present with a post-hoc Verification section, but the steps themselves lack inline validation checkpoints or feedback loops between stages.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

This is a single-purpose, self-contained skill with no need for external references and clearly organized sections (Overview, Core Principles, Steps, Expected Outcomes, Verification), qualifying for the top level under the simple-skill guideline.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and distinctive, with an explicit 'Use when' trigger and three concrete named behaviors. Its only weak spot is trigger-term coverage, which leans situational rather than offering a broad set of natural keyword variations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions ('Presents options rather than demands', 'times proposals for private audiences', 'allows superiors to feel ownership of decisions'), matching the anchor for three specific actions and exceeding the 'names domain and some actions' level below.

3 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ('Presents options rather than demands... times proposals... allows superiors to feel ownership') and when ('Use when advising rulers without direct confrontation'), satisfying the explicit-trigger anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant natural terms exist ('advising', 'direct confrontation', 'private audiences', 'superiors') but coverage of common variations is limited and the trigger is largely situational rather than keyword-rich, so it does not reach the broad coverage expected at the top level.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The court/ruler-advising niche with the classical idiom '开陈其端令人主自择' is highly specific and unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.