Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, concise, and gives a clearly sequenced workflow with validation and an error-recovery path. Its weakest point is actionability — the guidance is directional rather than illustrated with concrete examples or phrasing templates.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 short example exchanges or phrasing templates showing how to 'present the framework' and 'allow the decision' in a private audience, so the guidance is executable rather than purely directional.
Tighten the Overview so it does not restate the frontmatter description verbatim, recovering a few tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, well-organized into bullets, and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts; the only redundancy is the Overview restating the description, which could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete in direction ('Lay out the framework', 'Present multiple possible approaches', 'Highlight implications of each path') but stays abstract — it lacks example phrasings, sample dialogue, or a concrete template that would make the advice directly executable in a real audience. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Steps section gives a clear four-step sequence (Prepare → Choose Moment → Present Framework → Allow Decision) plus a Verification section, and Core Principle 4 supplies a feedback loop ('If a proposal is rejected... find alternative approaches or timing'); minor in-line checkpoint gaps keep it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is single-purpose with clean section structure (Overview, Core Principles, Steps, Expected Outcomes, Verification) and no need for external bundle files (none exist); it sits just over the ~50-line simple-skill threshold, so structure is good but not maximal. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |