Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow and verification checks. Its main weakness is actionability: the guidance is more abstract than concrete, lacking a worked example of the persuasion method in use.
Suggestions
Add a short worked example (e.g., a brief scenario → analogies chosen → proverbs invoked → resolution offered) to make the method concrete and copy-paste ready.
Include an explicit feedback loop in the Verification section: if the superior has not acknowledged urgency or committed to action, state which earlier step to revisit.
Tighten step 6 ('Offer a clear resolution') by specifying the form a resolution should take (a named action, a deadline, or an explicit command) rather than only 'specify exactly what action must be taken'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~27 lines), assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining background concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps name concrete techniques (historical analogies, proverbs, consequence analysis) and the Key Principles supply two real proverbs, but the guidance remains mostly abstract with no worked example showing the method applied end-to-end. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence is present alongside a dedicated Verification section with checkpoints, but there is no explicit feedback loop describing what to do when a verification check fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, the skill is well organized into Overview, Steps, Key Principles, Expected Outcomes, and Verification sections — meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |