crisis-delegation-to-trusted-aides

Use when managing a multi-domain crisis or coordinating emergency response across military, diplomatic, and administrative fronts. Delegates specific responsibilities to trusted subordinates while maintaining strategic oversight.

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_046/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise, clearly sequenced, and includes explicit validation checkpoints, making it a strong instruction-only skill. Its main limitation is that the step guidance is strategic rather than fully concrete and executable.

Suggestions

Add a concrete feedback loop in Validation (e.g., 'If a delegate reports overlap or stalled progress, reassign boundaries and re-verify') to push workflow clarity toward 5.

Tighten actionability by giving one specific tactic per step (e.g., under 'Provide clear instructions', name a concrete protocol format or cadence).

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and well-organized with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; the only mild tangent is the brief 'Historical Context' line, which keeps it just short of a 5.	4 / 5
Actionability	Steps and sub-bullets give concrete strategic guidance ('Define specific responsibilities', 'Establish communication protocols', 'Set clear boundaries of authority'), but the directions remain at a planning level without the specific how-to detail needed to be fully executable.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear five-step sequence is paired with an explicit Validation section containing three checkpoints; it stops short of a 5 because there is no validate->fix->retry feedback loop for failed checks.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	This is a sub-50-line single-purpose skill with no external bundle files and no need for them; its well-organized sections satisfy the simple-skill exception for a top score.	5 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has an explicit 'Use when' trigger and clearly states what the skill does across a specific multi-domain crisis niche. It is solid but not maximally specific or comprehensive in its action and keyword coverage.

Suggestions

Add concrete trigger synonyms (e.g., 'delegate tasks during a crisis', 'subordinate delegation', 'emergency command') to broaden keyword coverage.

Expand the 'what' with one or two more specific actions (e.g., 'assign authority boundaries', 'monitor delegate reports') to lift specificity toward 5.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (multi-domain crisis across military, diplomatic, and administrative fronts) and two concrete actions ('Delegates specific responsibilities to trusted subordinates', 'maintaining strategic oversight'), but coverage is not comprehensive.	3 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both 'what' ('Delegates specific responsibilities... while maintaining strategic oversight') and 'when' (an explicit 'Use when managing...' clause), though the 'what' could be slightly more concrete.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Relevant natural terms like 'managing a multi-domain crisis', 'coordinating emergency response', and 'military/diplomatic/administrative' are present, but common variations or synonyms (e.g., 'delegation', 'subordinates') are missing.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The crisis/emergency-response framing across named fronts is a fairly distinct niche with low overlap risk; only minor overlap with general leadership/management skills.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_046/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.