Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill presents a clear sequenced workflow with an explicit validation checklist and clean organization. Its main weaknesses are high-level rather than concrete guidance and a few non-essential illustrative sections.
Suggestions
Tighten or remove the Expected Outcomes and Historical Context sections, or fold their useful points into the steps, to improve conciseness.
Make step guidance more concrete and executable, e.g., specify how to define non-overlapping boundaries or what a communication protocol should contain.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean bullet prose with no concept over-explanation, but the Example Application, Expected Outcomes, and Historical Context sections are illustrative rather than instructional and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps give high-level direction ('Define specific responsibilities', 'Establish communication protocols') plus one concrete example, but lack the specific, executable detail needed for a 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps are followed by an explicit Validation checklist with three verification items, providing the feedback checkpoint a 3 requires. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with well-organized section headers and no need for external references, matching the simple-skill allowance for a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |