Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-sequenced with validation checkpoints, and appropriately organized for a simple skill. The chief weakness is actionability: the procedure is anchored to one historical case rather than generalized into reusable, executable guidance.
Suggestions
Generalize the steps beyond the Goujian example into reusable, situation-agnostic instructions (e.g. "Deploy a diplomat whose leverage the opponent respects" rather than naming Zhong), with the historical case as an illustrative example.
Add brief guidance on adapting each step to non-military or non-ancient contexts so the procedure is actionable outside the single anecdote.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — terse overview, compact numbered steps, no padding, and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps give concrete procedural guidance, but they are framed around a single historical example (Goujian/Zhong/Tai Zai Pi) and lack generalizable, adaptable instruction for other surrender scenarios, leaving the guidance incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence is paired with explicit Decision Points and a Verification section containing concrete validation checkpoints, matching the top anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, and organized into clear sections (Overview, Steps, Decision Points, Outcomes, Verification) with no external references needed, which scores 3 for simple skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |