crisis-response-rebellion

Use when responding to internal rebellion, coup attempts, or revolts against legitimate authority. Covers initial assessment of rebel forces and loyalist strength, response options (negotiation, military action, external intervention), and post-rebellion protocols for punishment, pardon, and institutional reform.

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise and well-organized with a useful verification checklist, but the guidance is high-level rather than specifically actionable and the workflow lacks integrated feedback loops. No bundle files are present, which is appropriate for this short, self-contained skill.

Suggestions

Add concrete decision criteria or thresholds to the response options (e.g., how to gauge whether loyalist forces are 'strong' enough for a military response) so the directives are fully actionable rather than abstract.

Tighten workflow clarity by inserting an inline feedback loop, e.g. 'After acting, re-run the Verification checks; if warning signs persist, return to Initial Assessment and adjust the response.'

Flesh out Initial Assessment with a few specific probes (force ratios, control of key infrastructure, foreign posture) so the assessment step produces a concrete, comparable result instead of generic prompts.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and efficient — short overview, terse bullet lists, and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place.	3 / 3
Actionability	Directives are concrete ('Execute or exile ringleaders', 'Secure key locations', 'Offer territorial concessions for assistance') but remain high-level, lacking the specific 'how' details that would make them fully actionable.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A logical sequence exists and the Verification section provides a gating checkpoint ('Confirm... before choosing a response option'), but there is no feedback/retry loop and the three response options are parallel alternatives rather than a sequenced path.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references and is organized into clear sections (Overview, Initial Assessment, Response Options, Post-Rebellion Actions, Warning Signs, Verification), satisfying the simple-skill allowance for a top score.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: concise, third-person imperative voice, with explicit 'Use when' triggers and a clear enumeration of concrete capabilities in a distinct niche. It scores at the top of every dimension.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete capabilities such as 'initial assessment of rebel forces and loyalist strength', 'negotiation, military action, external intervention', and 'punishment, pardon, and institutional reform', matching the top anchor for specific concrete actions.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both 'when' ('Use when responding to internal rebellion, coup attempts, or revolts') and 'what' ('Covers initial assessment... response options... post-rebellion protocols').	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Uses natural domain terms a user would say — 'internal rebellion, coup attempts, or revolts against legitimate authority' — with good variation (rebellion/coup/revolt) rather than technical jargon.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear, narrow niche (crisis response to coups/internal rebellion) with distinct triggers unlikely to collide with other skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_099/SKILL.md
Commit: 79c272f

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.