Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instruction-only skill with clear sequencing and a verification checklist, but its steps are abstract argumentative prompts rather than concrete actionable guidance. Adding specific phrasing templates or example dialogue would raise actionability.
Suggestions
Add concrete example phrasing or short scripted talking points for each step so the guidance is executable rather than abstract.
Tighten the Overview to avoid restating the step list, or merge it into the Steps section to save tokens.
Consider a brief 'How to use' note linking the Verification checks back to the corresponding steps for tighter feedback flow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence without explaining background concepts, but the Overview lightly restates the Steps and could be trimmed; mostly efficient with minor padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps like 'Remind them why your state serves as their ally' and 'Enemy forces are already at your borders' are argumentative talking points rather than concrete executable guidance; the framework describes what to argue but offers incomplete specifics on how to execute each step. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps are clearly sequenced and a dedicated Verification section provides three explicit checklist items; minor gaps in that there are no error-recovery feedback loops, though the operation is not destructive or batch so the 3-cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, and content is organized into well-signaled sections (Overview, Steps, Expected Outcome, Verification), meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |