Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized with a clear sequenced workflow and verification checklist, and it appropriately keeps everything inline given its small size. It is held back by abstract, non-copy-paste guidance and a slightly padded Expected Outcomes section.
Suggestions
Replace the aspirational 'Expected Outcomes' section with concrete success criteria or remove it, since it adds tokens without actionable guidance.
Tighten abstract steps like 'Demonstrate resolve' and 'Accept calculated risks' with specific, reproducible tactics (e.g., exact phrasing or observable signals) to raise actionability.
Add a brief concrete example of a credible reciprocal threat alongside the existing 'my head and the treasure' quote to make the Key Tactics immediately usable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean, but the 'Expected Outcomes' section ('Adversary respects your position', 'Personal reputation enhanced') is aspirational rather than instructional and does not earn its tokens. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps give clear directives but remain abstract ('Demonstrate resolve', 'Accept calculated risks'); for an instruction-only skill the guidance lacks the concrete, specific detail needed to be fully actionable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 1–7 sequence is paired with a 'Verification' checklist (confirm baselines, validate contingency plans, ensure documentation), providing explicit validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized sections (Steps, Key Tactics, Expected Outcomes, Verification), matching the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |