CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

diplomatic-pressure-with-respect

Use when bringing rebellious rulers back into submission without military force. Honors ancestral graves, selects envoys with prior relationships, provides face-saving language, and removes symbols of independent sovereignty.

70

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured, actionable, and workflow-clear with explicit verification checkpoints, appropriate for a concise instruction-only strategy skill. The only meaningful weakness is mild redundancy between the Implementation Steps and Key Techniques sections.

Suggestions

Collapse 'Key Techniques' into the relevant Implementation Steps or trim it to only net-new framing to remove redundancy with steps 1 and 4 and improve conciseness.

Optionally move the Zhao Tuo example into a single 'Worked example' callout so the historical reference is clearly distinguished from generalizable steps.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but the 'Key Techniques' section ('Honor Before Pressure', 'Allow Dignified Retreat') restates content already covered in Implementation Steps, so it could be tightened; not a 3 because of that redundancy, not a 1 because there is no padded boilerplate.

2 / 3

Actionability

For an instruction-only strategy skill it gives concrete, specific guidance with real examples — 'Accept explanations that blame others (e.g., the King of Changsha slandered me)' and 'Remove symbols of independent sovereignty (imperial titles, yellow canopy)' — meeting the actionable bar; absence of code is not penalized for instruction-only skills.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The five Implementation Steps are clearly sequenced and the closing Verification section provides explicit checkpoints ('Confirm ancestral graves... before diplomatic pressure is applied', 'Check that symbols... have been formally removed'), giving clear sequence with validation; this is a non-destructive process so the cap does not apply.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

It is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references and well-organized sections (Overview, Implementation Steps, Key Techniques, Expected Outcomes, Verification), which per the scoring notes can score 3 without bundle files.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and distinctive, clearly stating both the capability and an explicit 'Use when' trigger in third-person voice. Trigger-term naturalness is the weakest point: the wording is domain-specific rather than mirroring common phrasings a user would naturally say.

Suggestions

Add more user-natural trigger phrasings (e.g., 'when a vassal or subordinate ruler is rebelling and force is undesirable') to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Consider including a concrete situational cue users might actually say, such as 'defusing a rebellion' or 'negotiating surrender', to improve trigger_term_quality.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Honors ancestral graves, selects envoys with prior relationships, provides face-saving language, and removes symbols of independent sovereignty' — rather than vague abstractions, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly answers both 'what' (the four listed actions) and 'when' via the 'Use when bringing rebellious rulers back into submission without military force' clause, meeting the explicit-trigger bar; it is not a 2 because the trigger is stated, not merely implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Trigger phrase 'bringing rebellious rulers back into submission without military force' names the domain but uses fairly specialized wording; it covers the core scenario yet lacks common user-level variations, so it sits at the 'some relevant keywords but missing variations' level rather than full coverage.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is narrow and distinctive — diplomatic-pressure strategy against rebellious rulers — with triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, so conflict risk is low.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.