CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

distant-campaign-risk-assessment

Use when evaluating feasibility of campaigns against distant or nomadic enemies. Assesses strategic value, logistics (率三十锺而致一石), enemy mobility, domestic impact (靡弊中国), and historical precedents like Qin's failed Xiongnu campaigns.

65

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_235/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Distant Campaign Risk Assessment Framework

Overview

A systematic approach to evaluating military campaigns against distant targets, drawing on historical precedents and cost-benefit analysis.

Assessment Criteria

  1. Strategic Value of Target

    • "得其地不足以为利也" (Gaining their land provides insufficient benefit)
    • "遇其民不可役而守也" (The people there cannot be conscripted or governed)
    • Is the territory economically productive?
    • Can the population be integrated?
  2. Logistical Challenges

    • "轻兵深入,粮食必绝" (Light forces penetrating deep will run out of food)
    • "踵粮以行,重不及事" (Following with supplies is too slow to be effective)
    • Supply line length and vulnerability
    • Transportation costs ("率三十锺而致一石" - 30 measures transported to deliver 1)
  3. Enemy Characteristics

    • "无城郭之居,委积之守" (No cities or stored supplies)
    • "迁徙鸟举,难得而制也" (Migrate like birds, difficult to control)
    • Mobile vs. fixed targets
    • Ability to avoid engagement
  4. Domestic Impact

    • "靡弊中国" (Exhausting the central realm)
    • "百姓靡敝,孤寡老弱不能相养" (People exhausted, vulnerable cannot support themselves)
    • Risk of domestic instability from prolonged campaigns
  5. Historical Precedent Analysis

    • Study similar past campaigns
    • Identify patterns of success and failure
    • Example: Qin's failed campaigns against Xiongnu

Decision Framework

Proceed if:

  • Clear strategic benefit
  • Manageable logistics
  • Enemy can be decisively engaged
  • Domestic stability is assured

Avoid if:

  • Territory has no productive value
  • Enemy can avoid battle
  • Supply costs are prohibitive
  • Domestic unrest is likely

Expected Outcomes

  • Avoid costly failed campaigns
  • Preserve national resources
  • Maintain domestic stability
  • Focus military efforts on achievable objectives

Verification

  • Confirm all five assessment criteria (strategic value, logistics, enemy characteristics, domestic impact, historical precedent) have been evaluated
  • Validate that the cost-benefit analysis accounts for supply line ratios (30 measures transported per 1 delivered)
  • Check that the decision to proceed or avoid aligns with the framework conditions and domestic stability is not being jeopardized
Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.