Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, concise procedural skill with explicit verification checkpoints and clean sectioning. Its weakest point is actionability, where the positional interpretation criteria are underspecified within the steps and must be inferred from the historical example.
Suggestions
Make the 'Interpret the signs' step self-contained by stating what each position signifies (straddling, elbow resting, standing far, bowing on the knot) rather than deferring to the historical example.
Move the positional-meaning detail into the steps so the decision rule is actionable without reading the Historical Example section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — no padding about what a ritual or jade bi is — with only minor trims possible (the Overview line repeats the opening, and 'Expected Outcome' restates the overview), fitting the 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' anchor above the 3-anchor's unnecessary explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The procedure gives concrete steps ('Set up an altar', 'Secretly bury a jade bi in the chamber floor', 'fast and purify themselves'), but the 'Interpret the signs' step is left vague ('Different positions... each have meaning') without specifying what each means in the steps themselves, matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details' anchor rather than the 4-anchor's minor gaps. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five steps are clearly sequenced and a dedicated Verification section provides explicit checkpoints ('Confirm the ritual space was prepared with the hidden jade bi before candidates were summoned', 'Validate that all candidates underwent the same purification'), so the destructive-operation cap does not apply; it sits at the 4-anchor because there is no true validate-fix-retry feedback loop for this one-shot ritual. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines, has no need for external references, and is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Overview, Steps, Historical Example, Expected Outcome, Verification), qualifying for the simple-skill exception's top score; no bundle files exist to verify. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |