Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow with explicit validation and revision-recording steps, and appropriate one-level-deep reference split. Slight redundancy in the closing quick-reference table and summary examples is the only inefficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and project-specific (metric thresholds, exact commands) with no generic concept padding; minor redundancy from the summary-format examples and the final 快速参考 table that restates earlier content. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable commands (compute_quality.py --dry-run, record_revision.py with flags), exact TODO markers, and concrete summary-format templates cover the common upgrade cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five-step sequence (诊断→定档→执行→验证→记录) with an explicit validation checkpoint and feedback loop in 第四步, plus a mandatory revision-record step — no validation gap. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview in SKILL.md with detailed section templates split into a single one-level-deep, well-signaled reference file (references/section_templates.md) that exists and is linked from the body. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |