Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured classification framework with clear sequencing and a validation section. Its main weakness is that the land-allocation calculation is named but never specified, limiting actionability.
Suggestions
Add an explicit calculation or rule for land allocation (e.g., how 血缘 proximity and 襃有德 map to 四百里/百里/三十里) so 'Calculate land allocation' is executable rather than descriptive.
Include a short fix-and-retry feedback loop in the Validation section for cases where a noble is misclassified or land is misallocated.
Provide one worked example mapping a noble to rank, basis, and territory size to anchor the abstract framework.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and well-organized with no padding; it lists ranks, bases, and territory sizes without explaining concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete reference data (rank names, 亲亲之义/襃有德/尊勤劳 bases, territory sizes in 里) but 'Calculate land allocation' lacks an actual calculation method, leaving guidance incomplete for execution. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly numbered and a dedicated Validation section provides three explicit checkpoints; minor gaps are the absence of a fix-and-retry feedback loop and an undefined calculation step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, under-50-line single-purpose skill with well-organized sections and no need for external references, satisfying the simple-skill exception for full marks. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |