Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content cleanly presents the five-lens framework with a useful verification checklist and good organization, but the per-criterion guidance is more descriptive than actionable and somewhat redundant. Tightening the bullets and adding a concrete observation-gathering method would raise the weaker dimensions.
Suggestions
Replace the restating bullet pairs with a single concrete observation prompt per criterion to remove redundancy.
Add a brief, concrete method for gathering and weighting evidence across the five life conditions (e.g., what sources to consult, how to reconcile conflicting signals).
Soften the 'without needing additional investigation' over-claim in Expected Outcome, which is stronger than the framework guarantees.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, but each criterion restates the Chinese term, an English gloss, and two bullets that often restate the same idea (e.g., 'Their choice of companions reveals their values' / 'Look at their close friends and associates'), so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is framed as abstract observation prompts ('Do they share generously or hoard?', 'What lines will they not cross?') rather than a concrete method for gathering or weighing evidence, leaving the how incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Verification section supplies a 3-step validation checklist (confirm all five applied, validate cross-condition observations, check consistent patterns before deciding) that acts as explicit checkpoints before the appointment decision. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A sub-50-line single-purpose skill with no external references needed, organized into clear sections (Overview, Five Criteria, Expected Outcome, Verification) — well-organized sections suffice for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |