Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable procedural skill with clear sequencing and an explicit verification checklist. The main improvement area is adding more quantitatively specific diagnostic thresholds to lift actionability.
Suggestions
Add concrete, measurable thresholds where possible (e.g., pulse rate ranges in beats per minute for 浮/沉/数/迟 categories) to make guidance more executable.
Tighten 'Key Indicators' bullets into terser mappings to trim the few mildly explanatory lines.
Consider splitting the per-examination detail into a reference file if the body grows, keeping SKILL.md as an overview with one-level-deep pointers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean — numbered procedures and tight indicator mappings — with only minor explanatory lines that could be trimmed; it does not over-explain concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete procedural guidance throughout (e.g., 'Apply three levels of pressure (superficial, middle, deep)', pulse categories with hanzi), but lacks specific measurable thresholds that would make it fully copy-paste executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each examination and the Integration Process are clearly sequenced as numbered steps, and a dedicated Verification section provides an explicit checklist of validation steps before diagnosis is formulated. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly labeled sections with no nested or buried references; since the skill needs no external bundle files this structure is appropriate, though it slightly exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill threshold. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |