CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

four-examinations-diagnostic-method

Use when performing a comprehensive Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnosis. Applies the 四诊 framework (望诊 observation, 闻诊 listening/smelling, 问诊 inquiry, 切诊 pulse) to achieve pattern differentiation (辨证) and treatment planning.

65

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_187/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

70%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, self-contained instruction skill with clear sequencing and an explicit verification checklist. It loses points on conciseness (minor restating of obvious concepts) and actionability (procedures are general rather than diagnostically specific).

Suggestions

Trim obvious steps (e.g. 'Observe patient's general appearance') and the Bian Que reference; keep only diagnostically non-obvious guidance to tighten token use.

Add specific diagnostic criteria, e.g. tongue color/coating examples or the full set of pulse qualities beyond the four listed, to make the guidance more actionable.

Optionally move the per-examination indicator tables into a reference file once the skill grows, keeping SKILL.md as the overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean bullet lists with little fluff, but the Overview sentence ('referenced in Bian Que's practice') and some generic procedure steps ('Observe patient's general appearance and demeanor') restate things Claude could infer, fitting the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor rather than the top one.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete procedural steps and specific mappings are present (e.g. Floating=external, Deep=internal, Rapid=heat, Slow=cold), but guidance stays general in places — no diagnostic thresholds, tongue-coating detail, or full pulse-quality catalog — matching 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Each examination has a numbered procedure, the Integration Process is a sequenced 5-step flow, and an explicit Verification section provides a 3-point checklist ('Confirm all four examinations completed', 'Validate findings correlated', 'Ensure diagnosis includes pattern differentiation and treatment principle'), matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps / checklists' anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained file organized into clear sections (Overview, four examination subsections, Integration Process, Expected Outcome, Verification) with no external references needed; per the simple-skill note, well-organized sections suffice for the top anchor.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with an explicit 'Use when' trigger, concrete examination methods, and clear outcomes. Its only weakness is limited coverage of natural trigger-term variations such as the common 'TCM' abbreviation.

Suggestions

Add common natural-language triggers users would actually say, e.g. 'TCM diagnosis', 'Chinese medicine consultation', or 'pulse and tongue diagnosis'.

Keep the 'Use when' clause but broaden it slightly to cover partial triggers (e.g. 'when the user asks for a TCM diagnosis or pattern differentiation').

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete examination methods (望诊 observation, 闻诊 listening/smelling, 问诊 inquiry, 切诊 pulse) plus two concrete outcomes (pattern differentiation, treatment planning), matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Applies the 四诊 framework ... to achieve pattern differentiation and treatment planning') and when ('Use when performing a comprehensive Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnosis'), matching the top anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes the natural phrase 'comprehensive Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnosis' but omits common variations users would say such as 'TCM' or 'Chinese medicine', fitting the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 四诊 TCM-diagnostic niche is highly specific with distinct triggers and is unlikely to overlap with unrelated skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.