CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

governance-approach-selection

Use when choosing between transformative and adaptive governance for a new territory. Compares Bo Qin's 3-year reform approach in Lu with Taigong's 5-month adaptive method in Qi, guided by the principle: 政不简不易,民不近.

70

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise and well-structured with a clear decision workflow and explicit validation checkpoints. The main gap is actionability: the guidance is conceptual and lacks a concrete worked example or executable decision procedure that would make it copy-paste ready.

Suggestions

Add a short worked example showing the decision procedure applied end-to-end (given a territory's conditions, walk through each criterion to a concrete recommendation), making the guidance copy-paste actionable.

Provide a compact decision table or flow that maps (urgency × cultural-distance × long-term-goal) combinations to a named approach, so Claude can act deterministically rather than infer.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and well-organized with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Two Approaches, Decision Criteria, Key Principle, Expected Outcomes, Warning, Validation) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Decision criteria are concrete ('If quick stabilization is needed, choose adaptive approach') with specific timelines, but the guidance is conceptual rather than copy-paste ready — there are no executable artifacts or worked decision example, so it sits at 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' rather than fully actionable.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The decision flow is sequenced (criteria → choose approach → warning) and capped by an explicit Validation section with checkpoints ('Confirm the decision criteria were properly evaluated', 'Verify the chosen approach matches conditions', 'Check the outcome'), matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references and well-organized sections, which per the scoring notes can score 3 on progressive disclosure when content is clear and well-organized.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it specifies concrete actions, names the contrasting approaches with timelines, and opens with an explicit 'Use when' trigger that clearly defines the niche. Its only weakness is narrow trigger vocabulary that limits keyword coverage.

Suggestions

Broaden trigger terms to cover natural variations users might say, e.g. 'Use when deciding a governance strategy for a new territory, weighing rapid stabilization against deep cultural reform, or comparing adaptive vs transformative reform approaches.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete elements — 'choosing between transformative and adaptive governance', Bo Qin's '3-year reform approach in Lu' versus Taigong's '5-month adaptive method in Qi' — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (compares the two approaches) and when (explicit 'Use when...' clause), matching the 'clearly answers both what AND when with explicit triggers' anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The 'Use when choosing between transformative and adaptive governance for a new territory' trigger is natural but narrow — 'governance' is the only real keyword with few common variations, fitting the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor rather than broad coverage.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche — selecting between two named historical governance methods — with distinct triggers that are unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.