CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

governance-transition-framework

Use when transitioning from conquest to stabilization or diagnosing dynastic failure. Applies the principle that 取与守不同术也 (taking and keeping power require different methods), shifting from military force (诈力) to benevolence and adaptability (顺权).

62

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_036/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

70%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A concise, well-organized conceptual framework with clear sequencing and explicit validation checkpoints. Its main weakness is actionability: the guidance is abstract and would benefit from concrete examples of how to assess a phase and what phase-appropriate policies look like.

Suggestions

Add a concrete example of how to assess whether a situation is in the conquest (攻) vs stabilization (守) phase — e.g., signals or criteria — to lift actionability.

Replace 'Adjust policies accordingly' with a short worked example of a concrete benevolence/adaptability (顺权) policy change addressing popular support.

Tighten the Overview/Core Principle sections to avoid restating the description's thesis, reclaiming tokens.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and avoids explaining known concepts, but the Overview and Core Principle sections restate the thesis already present in the description ('Conquest requires different methods than stabilization'), which could be tightened; this matches the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor.

2 / 3

Actionability

It gives directional guidance ('Assess current phase', 'Adjust policies accordingly', 'Transition leadership approach') but lacks concrete specifics on how to assess a phase or what a concrete benevolence/adaptability policy looks like, fitting the incomplete-guidance anchor rather than the fully executable one.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Application section gives a clear 3-step sequence and a dedicated Validation section with explicit checkpoints ('Verify that the current governance phase... has been correctly assessed', 'Confirm that conquest-phase tactics... are not being applied'), matching the clear-sequence-with-explicit-validation anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, has no external references (references/, scripts/, assets/ are all absent), and is well-organized into clear sections (Overview, Core Principle, Decision framework, Critical Warning, Application, Validation), satisfying the simple-skill allowance for a top score.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-formed description with an explicit 'Use when' trigger and a distinctive niche anchored in a classical governance principle. It fully satisfies completeness and distinctiveness, with only modest headroom on specificity and trigger-term breadth.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain (dynastic governance) and the two phases with their methods ('military force (诈力)' vs 'benevolence and adaptability (顺权)'), but the actions ('transitioning', 'diagnosing', 'shifting') are abstract conceptual operations rather than the multiple concrete actions the top anchor requires.

2 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly answers both 'what' ('Applies the principle that... shifting from military force to benevolence and adaptability') and 'when' via an explicit 'Use when...' trigger, matching the top anchor; it is not merely implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It uses an explicit 'Use when transitioning from conquest to stabilization or diagnosing dynastic failure' clause with relevant niche keywords, but coverage is narrow with no common synonym variations, so it sits below the broad-coverage top anchor.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The framing — dynastic governance transition anchored on the classical principle 取与守不同术也 — is a clear, highly specific niche with distinct triggers unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.