Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, mostly actionable instruction-only procedure with a clear sequenced workflow and verification step. Weakest in conciseness (minor redundancy) and actionability/workflow_clarity (missing quantitative specifics and inter-step feedback).
Suggestions
Tighten conciseness by merging 'Expected Outcomes' into the Overview or reducing it to a single line, since it restates the peace/stability benefits already implied.
Add concrete specifics to the Tribute Agreement step — example annual quantities or the relevant Han reign (e.g., Gaozu/Liu Bang's treaty) — so the guidance is fully actionable rather than illustrative.
Add an inter-step validation checkpoint (e.g., after Marriage Alliance, confirm both parties ratified terms before scheduling tribute) so the workflow has a feedback loop rather than only a terminal verification.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet structure with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the 'Expected Outcomes' section partially restates the Overview's purpose and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance — named tribute items (絮缯, 酒米, 金帛丝絮), roles (Yanzhi/阏氏, Shanyu), and quoted treaty text — but lacks specifics like tribute quantities or the relevant reign/era, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 1–5 procedure with a terminal Verification section, but verification is post-hoc with no inter-step checkpoints or feedback loops for failed treaty terms. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple sub-55-line, single-purpose procedure with well-organized section headers and no need for external references, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |