Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clean, well-structured historical-procedure reference that is concise, clearly sequenced, and includes explicit verification — the main weakness is that it describes a historical process rather than giving the model a concrete actionable task to perform.
Suggestions
Reframe the Steps section toward instruction (e.g., 'To apply Heqin terms: 1. Identify the tribute schedule...') so the guidance is actionable rather than purely descriptive of past events, which would lift actionability.
Add a short worked example of composing a treaty clause or tribute manifest the model could produce, giving copy-paste-ready output to support the actionability dimension.
Consider moving the bilingual treaty quotations into a compact reference table so the boundary/tribute terms are scannable as a lookup rather than prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean bullet-pointed content with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries substantive detail (real tribute items, treaty phrases), so it respects the token budget and assumes competence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete specifics are present — "絮缯", "酒米", "金帛丝絮", and quoted treaty clauses like "犯约者杀之" — but the body largely describes what historically occurred rather than giving Claude executable instructions, fitting the score-2 anchor of concrete-but-incomplete guidance. It is not score 1 because nothing is vague or abstract, and not score 3 because there is no copy-paste-ready actionable procedure to perform. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps are explicitly sequenced (Initial Negotiation → Marriage Alliance → Tribute Agreement → Border Protocols → Trade Relations) and capped by a dedicated Verification section with concrete checkpoints (confirm treaty terms, validate tribute delivery, check border markets), satisfying the explicit-validation requirement for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clear sections (Overview, Prerequisites, Steps, Treaty Terms, Expected Outcomes, Verification), which per the rubric guidelines earns a 3 for a simple skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |